 |
11-12-2006, 04:13 PM
|
#1
|
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR SOG Member '03 Finalist Taos SOPA '03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA '03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA '04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
|
And a couple more for the heck of it ...
This first is obviously not the full composition. I would sure like to see the full image, this slice sure looks interesting.
The Magic Circle 72x50
Windswept 45x31
__________________
Mike McCarty
|
|
|
11-13-2006, 08:24 PM
|
#2
|
Juried Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: 8543-dk Hornslet, Denmark
Posts: 1,642
|
Mike,
I think that Waterhouse's strength is his sense of decorative composition. He lived in the period when Art Nouveau was popular and I guess that was his luck. The persons are types, all young and beautiful, a sort of idealized, without too much personal character.
|
|
|
11-13-2006, 08:48 PM
|
#3
|
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR SOG Member '03 Finalist Taos SOPA '03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA '03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA '04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
|
I think you're right about that Allan.
Quote:
He painted always like a scholar and a gentleman, though not like a great artist."
|
I still don't understand why they had to say such things in a man's obituary. In all my years I've seen a lot of good, bad and ugly people die, I've listened to many lives explained, and I don't remember hearing such harshness spoken in print after a person's death. When you're alive then all is fair game, but it just seems like a small thing to show a man's life work some respect on the occasion of his death.
__________________
Mike McCarty
|
|
|
11-13-2006, 09:09 PM
|
#4
|
Juried Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: 8543-dk Hornslet, Denmark
Posts: 1,642
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike McCarty
I still don't understand why they had to say such things in a man's obituary. In all my years I've seen a lot of good, bad and ugly people die, I've listened to many lives explained, and I don't remember hearing such harshness spoken in print after a person's death. When you're alive then all is fair game, but it just seems like a small thing to show a man's life work some respect on the occasion of his death.
|
Mike,
Maybe it was jealousy. If one is popular in his own time he will experience both pro's and contra's. His supporters would buy his art as long as he lived even though new trends had taken over. The critics would be frustrated and forget the good manners.
One of our own fine artists, Kr
|
|
|
11-17-2006, 11:01 PM
|
#5
|
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR SOG Member '03 Finalist Taos SOPA '03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA '03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA '04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
|
Here is "El Jaleo" by John Singer Sargent, 1882, 93" x 138"
With various studies of the same.
__________________
Mike McCarty
|
|
|
11-18-2006, 03:23 PM
|
#6
|
SOG Member '02 Finalist, PSA '01 Merit Award, PSA '99 Finalist, PSA
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 819
|
Mike--
Leapfrogging backward, thanks for the Waterhouses (Waterhice?) (Waterhai?). He's always been a favorite though I disagree a little, respectfully, with Allan. For me, JWH's people are part of the style of the day, but a little less anonymous and stylistically codified than some of the other academic contemporaries like Alma-Tadema and Rosetti, et. al. Waterhouse's subjects look more like individuals to me, and less like types.
I can't quite find the words, but when I look at Waterhouse, I see a little looser approach to the technique, and a spirit that--for lack of a better term--I can only call "soul." He seems a little less constrained by the academic approach.
This is a really vague critique, I know.
As for "El Jaleo," well, Jeez, you gotta think Sargent tossed it off to needle every painter that would ever follow.
Thanks--TE
__________________
TomEdgerton.com
"The dream drives the action."
--Thomas Berry, 1999
|
|
|
11-18-2006, 10:06 PM
|
#7
|
Associate Member SoCal-ASOPA Founder FT Professional
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: Laguna Hills, CA
Posts: 1,395
|
Someone please explain why the lady in red in the back row. Why do you think he chose such a saturated red, rather then toning it down?
You think it has a purpose, if so what?
I love to see the sketches that precede the painting. It is always great to see how arrangements get changed to better a composition. Too bad there are not many color studies left behind.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 286 (0 members and 286 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 AM.
|