 |
06-10-2005, 07:26 PM
|
#1
|
Approved Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,730
|
Dianne,
Your neck and head proportions are much better.
Was this a group session or your own model?
It would be better to have had more simplified lighting so you would have a stronger light and dark pattern on your head. The disparate sources of light create a busy pattern destroying the form, it should be much simpler.
|
|
|
06-10-2005, 07:52 PM
|
#2
|
CAFE & BUSINESS MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460
|
I agree with Sharon, one light source (and windows are a light source) will make your life so much easier and result in a more three dimensional painting.
|
|
|
06-11-2005, 12:36 AM
|
#3
|
Juried Member FT Professional
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 208
|
Thanks for the additional critique Sharon and Michele.
It was done as a group session.
Yes lighting is a problem as my studio has a very large skylight. The sun passes so quickly over the skylight that it makes it difficult to grab the shadows. Therefore I began using a lamp. But we still get that sun from the skylight.
So do you think I should forgo the daylight lamp on the model and just depend on the skylight?
Thank you.
Dianne
|
|
|
06-11-2005, 12:47 AM
|
#4
|
Juried Member Finalist, Int'l Salon 2006
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 324
|
question of perspective
Hi Dianne,
On top of Sharon and Michele's advice, you may like to look at the issue on perspectives. The way i see this portrait is a slight forward hunch by the model. As a result, certain features of her head and body are subjected to perspective. I hope it makes sense to you.
|
|
|
06-11-2005, 01:00 AM
|
#5
|
Juried Member FT Professional
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 208
|
perspective
Thank you Marcus for the observation on perspective and for your help. You are absolutely right.
However, I took the photograph after I painted the painting. The model was not hunched over but rather sitting quite erect when were were working. I only used the photo for some detail work on her face. It is not a reference photo.
I do appreciate your help.
Dianne
|
|
|
06-12-2005, 06:40 AM
|
#6
|
Juried Member Finalist, Int'l Salon 2006
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 324
|
Oh i'm really sorry...i didn't know that was the case.
|
|
|
06-12-2005, 08:09 AM
|
#7
|
Approved Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,730
|
Dianne,
Studio lighting is a rather complex issue.
I don't know where the skylight is vis-a-vis the model. Check out the book I told you about to help you resolve your lighting isuues.
If it is not a constant light source it is unworkable.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20 PM.
|