 |
05-15-2005, 05:20 PM
|
#1
|
Juried Member FT Professional
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 302
|
Carolyn, I think you have a gorgeous portrait of a gorgeous woman here. What character in her face! What a gentle treatment you have done as well. It's lovely. I really like the way you often leave some unfinished parts where the ground is left untouched however, I find the trasition in this one a tiny bit harsh. I think because our eye is led from the subject to the little table there is an abrupt stop there. I agree, maybe some looser strokes could be added. Maybe a bit longer transition from the subject to the table. Truth is, I have no room to critique such a nice work and what I have said is only my opinon...except the part where I said it was gorgeous. That's a fact! You know, I even like the first picture you posted. Just the head and shoulders works for me too.
|
|
|
05-16-2005, 04:52 AM
|
#2
|
Juried Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: High Peak Derbyshire UK
Posts: 106
|
Thanks everyone for the input, I actually agree with the points about the harsh transition but I went to such pains to keep the paper clean this time I wanted some input before I carried on.
I have made the adjustments to the background and the fingers but I won't bother posting them, I am definitely putting this one behind glass now.
It was a good practice of a more detailed look at a face and worth doing it for that.
Carolyn.
After reading Cindy's post in the oil critique section I decided to repost after taking onboard all valued input
Last edited by Carolyn Bannister; 05-16-2005 at 08:27 AM.
|
|
|
05-23-2005, 04:03 PM
|
#3
|
Juried Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: 8543-dk Hornslet, Denmark
Posts: 1,642
|
Now I am really nitpicking! These small frames don
|
|
|
05-23-2005, 05:08 PM
|
#4
|
Juried Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: High Peak Derbyshire UK
Posts: 106
|
Allan,
I couldn't agree more
To me it looks childish and amateurish
I've actually put it away in and started on a new one but now you've got me thinking about it again.
I thought about cropping it and just keeping the head and shoulders but I should rise to the challenge and figure out a way to make it work, I really would like to keep the depth to the room.
How about a curtain from ceiling to floor and make the whole of the back of the room very dark?
Maybe that's what I liked about the ref in the first place.
Thanks for taking the time to critique, I really do value your input.
Last edited by Carolyn Bannister; 05-23-2005 at 05:09 PM.
|
|
|
05-23-2005, 07:58 PM
|
#5
|
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR SOG Member '03 Finalist Taos SOPA '03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA '03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA '04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
|
I think this composition would be best suited to a full completion of the background.
When I first saw your reference I thought that it was the vertical wall segments, with their variations in value, that connected the foreground to the background. I think you could have more success by re-visiting your reference and covering the entire paper.
This is worth taking further, I think.
__________________
Mike McCarty
|
|
|
05-25-2005, 05:13 AM
|
#6
|
Juried Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: High Peak Derbyshire UK
Posts: 106
|
Not the best photo, it's blowing a gale outside, it was a struggle sticking it to the shutters (thats a professional photography term  )
For some reason resizing it has made the table look a bit bent, but I think I've got away with it for real.
Is it a  or a  this time, if its a no I'm going to crop it
ps. Why do I feel just like I did in school when I always got ' could do better' on my reports.
Last edited by Carolyn Bannister; 05-25-2005 at 05:51 AM.
|
|
|
05-25-2005, 06:06 AM
|
#7
|
Juried Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: 8543-dk Hornslet, Denmark
Posts: 1,642
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carolyn Bannister
Is it a  or a  this time, if its a no I'm going to crop it 
|
Please don
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Topics
|
Thread |
Topic Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
Proud husband
|
Timothy C. Tyler |
Cafe Guerbois Discussions - Moderator: Michele Rushworth |
6 |
12-04-2002 02:29 PM |
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29 AM.
|