 |
03-20-2005, 11:16 PM
|
#1
|
SENIOR MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional, Author '03 Finalist, PSofATL '02 Finalist, PSofATL '02 1st Place, WCSPA '01 Honors, WCSPA Featured in Artists Mag.
Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,481
|
Matthew,
There is absolutely nothing that matters as much as progress - every hour at the easel is well spent.
I have found that the funny thing about pastels, is that even if you have 1000 sticks, you'll never really have the right one, so you are forced to get at the color you want in an indirect way.
As to the sharp point issue, I htink it is easier to get at fine detail by carving away at an already placed stroke.
|
|
|
03-22-2005, 08:33 PM
|
#2
|
Juried Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 123
|
Quote:
What caught my attention right away is that the eyes appear to be too high in the head. Typically eyes are half way between the chin and top of the head. I suggest you measure your source photo (or model) and check this.
|
Debra,
I completely agree that it looks wrong, but I checked up on it and the eye position is correct. I didn't realize until you mentioned it how high his eyes really are! Apparently the half way rule doesn
|
|
|
03-22-2005, 08:46 PM
|
#3
|
SENIOR MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional, Author '03 Finalist, PSofATL '02 Finalist, PSofATL '02 1st Place, WCSPA '01 Honors, WCSPA Featured in Artists Mag.
Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,481
|
Matthew, the eyes are too high.
In most normal adult face to face eye-level to eye level, the tear duct is in the middle of the head, measured from top of the head to the chin. Your view point is below eye level, but I do not think this can be the case. I'd be happy to try to detail observations, if you would care to post the source photo.
And yes, you are doing great work!
|
|
|
03-22-2005, 08:48 PM
|
#4
|
SENIOR MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional, Author '03 Finalist, PSofATL '02 Finalist, PSofATL '02 1st Place, WCSPA '01 Honors, WCSPA Featured in Artists Mag.
Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,481
|
ps. It may be that your source photo has taken on distortion due to either lens or proximity, in which case the image might agree with the source photo, but the source photo won't agree with the subject..
|
|
|
03-22-2005, 09:59 PM
|
#5
|
Juried Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 123
|
Here is the photo.
YIKES! The flaws in my portrait are disturbing when I compare them side by side.
Matthew
|
|
|
03-24-2005, 09:42 AM
|
#6
|
Juried Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 123
|
I'm happy with the ear, and thats about it *laughs*
I spent another hour in front of this piece and worked out some of the major flaws. Although I still don't know what to think of the eye position.
I still need to fix his cheekbones and eyes
|
|
|
03-29-2005, 10:34 PM
|
#7
|
SENIOR MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional, Author '03 Finalist, PSofATL '02 Finalist, PSofATL '02 1st Place, WCSPA '01 Honors, WCSPA Featured in Artists Mag.
Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,481
|
Lend me your ears
I love painting ears. I really mean I LOVE painting ears! Ears are every bit as much a feature as eyes, mouth or nose.
I think that ears are underrated as to their importance in likeness.
This spring I am taking a forensic workshop with Karen Taylor at the Scottsdale Artists' School. There are forensic expertrs who believe that ear shapes are every bit as accurate as fingerprints in identifying an individual. We should all pay attention to ears.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 AM.
|