Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Digital cameras
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Old 06-13-2004, 11:35 PM   #1
Garth Herrick Garth Herrick is offline
SOG Member
FT Professional
'09 Honors, Finalist, PSOA
'07 Cert of Excel PSOA
'06 Cert of Excel PSOA
'06 Semifinalist, Smithsonian OBPC
'05 Finalist, PSOA
 
Garth Herrick's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,445
Large pixels versus small pixels




Dear Mike and Jean,

I think what we are finding in your comparisons between cameras, is that ISO 200 on the Nikon D70 (or my D100) yields a similar picture quality to ISO 50 on the Nikon Coolpix 5400, and along the same scale, ISO 1600 on the D70/D100 is about the equivalent picture noise quality as ISO 400 on the Coolpix. This has everything to do with the actual size of each pixel on the sensor. The sensor is much, much larger on the SLR type digital, and therefore each pixel is relatively larger too. When the pixels are larger they work cleaner and generate less noise at the equivalent ISO rating. This gives the Nikon D70/ D100 vastly increased sensitivity in low light without much sacrifice in quality. On the other hand, the Nikon Coolpix 5400 has the great advantage of being lightweight, handy and portable all day in a pocket, with no bulky long lenses knocking into everything. There is a good reason for liking each camera.

Garth
__________________
www.garthherrick.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2004, 12:03 AM   #2
Mike McCarty Mike McCarty is offline
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR
SOG Member
'03 Finalist Taos SOPA
'03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA
'03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA
'04 Finalist Taos SOPA
 
Mike McCarty's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
Jean and Garth,

This digital equipment is still pretty new to me and I'm learning a lot as we go. I think your analysis, Garth, is accurate. Nikon has all but told us so in the way they have configured the different ISO selections between the two cameras. One 50-400 the other 200-1600.

Having a better understanding of the individuals equipment can give us a better insight into how we might advise them through different situations.

In those ancient film days photography was film specific. No matter how clunky your equipment, you could shoot state of the art film. With digital, it's all equipment specific.

I've learned a great deal here.
__________________
Mike McCarty
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2004, 12:27 AM   #3
Jean Kelly Jean Kelly is offline
Associate Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,567
Thank you both. Being the real novice here, I really feel I've gained the most from this experiment, and had fun too (and gotten some great flood pics)!

Jean
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Topic Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Young woman Jean Kelly Resource Photo Critiques 11 06-11-2004 11:47 AM
A little experiment Leslie Bohoss Old Master Copy Critiques 5 12-04-2002 03:17 PM

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.