Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Cafe Guerbois Discussions - Moderator: Michele Rushworth
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Old 04-22-2004, 02:01 AM   #1
Garth Herrick Garth Herrick is offline
SOG Member
FT Professional
'09 Honors, Finalist, PSOA
'07 Cert of Excel PSOA
'06 Cert of Excel PSOA
'06 Semifinalist, Smithsonian OBPC
'05 Finalist, PSOA
 
Garth Herrick's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,445



Quote:
Originally Posted by Kimberly Dow
Thank you for all the replies. I guess it does come down to intent mostly.

I was on another forum talking about how I hate to name paintings. I have trouble with it. I use up my creativity on the visual and can not always come up with a good title. That is one of the reasons I have "Flowers & Friut I" through "Flowers & Fruit VI". I was asking how important the names really were and this is a good example. The names of paintings can tell us sometimes if they are portraits or figuratives. If I names the above painting "Dailey by the Stream" it would be seen differently I imagine. (Then again, with her name someone might think I misspelled daily).
Dailey might visit the stream daily, anyway. It's a beautiful place.
__________________
www.garthherrick.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2004, 02:21 PM   #2
Morris Darby Morris Darby is offline
Associate Member
 
Morris Darby's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 55
I agree with Mike McCarty

I like the comparison of the fireplaces. That says it best.

Naming paintings....now, that's the pits. One of the masters named his painting "Girl in a chair", now no one on earth can use that name again. All the simple names have been taken.

"Boy by a tree"
"The Boat"
"Man in a boat"
"Girl with a pearl earring"
"Woman smiling"

I guess I'll have to resort to the 21st century naming...

"Dude chilling"
"Wassup"
and
"Maaaann"
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2004, 10:14 AM   #3
Janel Maples Janel Maples is offline
Juried Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 328
I guess I have to say I agree with Mike McCarty.

My fireplace, "Portrait of my daughters"

Someone else's fireplace, "Stopping for a closer look" (or something like that)

Isn't that the beauty of art? It is what the creator says it is? Even if it is that what they say only to them?

Is the question possibly what is the difference between a portrait and figurative IN THIS FORUM?

Because, obviously, I could not put a bunch of blobs of paint on a canvas and post it in the critique section and call it "Portrait of my half second cousin, twice removed" (Which I recently learned from Family Tree Maker is a valid explanation of a relative, very distant but related)
and expect to get away with it.

Well, now that I think of it, I could call it "Self portrait in the morning" and be accurate.

Never mind.

Janel Maples
Attached Images
 
__________________
Janel Maples
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Topic Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prices for portraits of adults verses prices for portraits of children. Mary Reilly Business, Marketing & PR 1 01-19-2004 11:23 AM
Unintentional portraits Loretta Fasan Composition 1 10-17-2002 02:00 PM
Unintentional portraits Loretta Fasan New Member Introductions - Moderator: Mary Sparrow 3 09-24-2002 02:00 AM
Looking to get back to painting portraits. Tarique Beg Business, Marketing & PR 8 10-17-2001 01:49 AM

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.