 |
09-06-2003, 02:50 PM
|
#1
|
Associate Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 37
|
Jerry Thomas corrected
Here is the corrected painting of Jerry Thomas that I posted a couple of weeks ago with your suggestions. I think that this painting taught me alot about realing studying values and making good judgements. Any comments or suggestions on how to improve this painting would be greatly appreciated, since I'm still learning.
__________________
Bryan S. Morgan
|
|
|
09-07-2003, 10:28 AM
|
#2
|
Juried Member Guy who can draw a little
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: New Iberia, LA
Posts: 546
|
Looking good, Bryan. Much improved.
There are two things I'd work on, though. The shadowed side of the neck is catching too much light. It's as bright as the lit side. I find it distracting. In the photo, it goes to nearly black, which would not be appropriate in a painting, but it tells you that this area is as dark as any dark you use elsewhere.
Also, the bridge of the nose is too sharply defined. In the photo, the nose is softly rounded.
You're almost there. Nice work.
|
|
|
09-08-2003, 01:25 PM
|
#3
|
Associate Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 37
|
Thanks
Jeff,
Thanks for the suggestions. I do see what you're talking about, the neck is too light. I will adjust the values and also correct the nose. This painting has been a great learning experience for me. Hopefully one day I will be able to render a portrait as absolutely photo realistic.
__________________
Bryan S. Morgan
|
|
|
09-09-2003, 11:06 AM
|
#4
|
Juried Member PT 5+ years
Joined: Nov 2001
Location: Stillwater, MN
Posts: 1,801
|
Very big improvement overall.
The new background could be more effective, I think. The hue on our left is very intense. I believe you would benefit by cutting that back a little (moving away from the yellow toward the blue on the spectrum. Please note that I'm NOT saying make the background blue, just cut the intensity of the yellow-orange on our left. It's competing very strongly with the subject. As has been said by others, backgrounds should stay back.)
And I think the depth of the piece overall would be enhanced by slightly lowering the value of the background on our right (the subject's lighted side), which will increase the value contrast between the subject and the background and thereby separate them.
Very nice work on the "rebuild".
|
|
|
09-09-2003, 11:41 AM
|
#5
|
Juried Member Guy who can draw a little
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: New Iberia, LA
Posts: 546
|
Quote:
Hopefully one day I will be able to render a portrait as absolutely photo realistic.
|
Ouch! Don't do that! Read the recent thread on Cafe Guerbois. It's not about photo reproduction. It's about capturing the essence of the person.
But let's face it, if you did make paintings that were photo realistic, there would be a market for it.
|
|
|
09-09-2003, 03:16 PM
|
#6
|
Associate Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 37
|
Repy to suggestion
Steven,
Thanks for the advice it really paid off. Actually the background value on the lighter side of the subject is darker, The camera just didn't capture it. But I do agree with you on toning down the yellow orange to a more cooler color. Again thanks for your time and comments.
__________________
Bryan S. Morgan
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 PM.
|