This question still nags at me. For now, I'd be happy just to be able to copy a photo, much less move beyond, but I have a thought.
This applies to painting. I have been studying many paintings on the web and in books, and I've come to the conclusion that one pitfall of photo copying is a potential for a lack of color harmony. Holly's page on Marvin's workshop got me thinking about harmonious palettes.
If I slavishly copied a photo, it might take two dozen or more separate colors to match everything precisely. If, on the other hand, I mixed a palette of harmonious, but limited colors, even if they don't match the photo, I would pull the image together beyond what a camera is capable of.
This is not news to many of you. I'm just trying to flesh out the concepts that I think I'm learning.
I checked out Chris' book from the library, and I'm learning other concepts, like value clumping, that can be pitfalls of photographs.
If I ever get so far as to paint portraits on a regular basis, I'll almost certainly be working only from photos, so I want to prepare myself for the challenges.
Thanks for bearing with me.
|
Hybrid Mode
