Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Cafe Guerbois Discussions - Moderator: Michele Rushworth


 
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-02-2002, 11:06 PM   #12
Jim Riley Jim Riley is offline
SOG Member
FT Pro 35 yrs
 
Jim Riley's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 305
Send a message via ICQ to Jim Riley
exclamation

I also get upset with businessmen who call me "sweetie".

Kidding aside, I'm sorry that behavior like that still exists and I am aware that it still does, unfortunately. My local reputation within the business community and work with civic organizations has spared me some of kind of attitude but occasionally a businessman (?) will suggest that I may not understand certain things "because you are an artist". If I think they can handle it I tell them being an artist is additive.

I am having a little problem with the idea of imagery and character/personality as separate things. I would not paint, photograph or otherwise choose to portray a subject with a smile because the "image" looked good and might make a good painting even though the subject was known not to smile and was otherwise mean spirited.

From a day in and day out perspective it seems that the best situation is to have enough time in discussion/photographing/sitting to allow pretense to dissolve and unguarded mannerism to emerge. Then, as Chase said " Do not imagine that I would disregard that thing that lies beneath the mask... But be sure that when the outside is rightly seen, the thing that lies under the surface will be found upon your canvas." A tilt of the head, a smile (or frown, if not from boredom), and any other characteristics that might be revealing when one is at ease and not threatened or asked to perform (as in "smile") is valuable.

It would seem that on a commercial basis we are mostly obligated to sum up, as much as possible, how a subject is known to the client, and how the work will be presented to family, friends, the public, institutions, etc., unless, as the artist, we are part of that community, our personal biases should be secondary. I do not know how many "sensitive" portraits are the result of painting sensitive people, and on this agree with Mike. We usually make that assumption when we admire a painting, but subject profiles and personality types never accompany the work. There is no history or study that I know of showing any corollary.

If the subject smiles often in the most natural way and without prompting, it is hard to discourage a smiling portrait. On the other hand, knowing that this same subject has survived tragedies and trauma adds more considerations than my skills can handle or than the best portrait can bring back a lost child to a grieving parent.
__________________
Jim Riley
Lancaster Pa. Portrait Artist
  Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic
Search this Topic:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.