Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Digital cameras
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


 
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-08-2006, 09:41 AM   #2
Julie Deane Julie Deane is offline
Juried Member
 
Julie Deane's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Gainesville, GA
Posts: 1,298
Thank you, Mike, for making this clear. It will really help for the day when I can afford a digital SLR.

I had been thinking that the standard kit lens was too short (55 - 70 mm). Now it appears that it is actually the approximate equivalent of a 85 -105 (film) lens. As someone used to the old style lenses, this conversion info helps immeasurably.
__________________
Julie Deane
www.discerningeyeportraits.com
Member of Merit, Portrait Society of Atlanta
  Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Topic Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Full length portrait Julie Boyles Portrait Unveilings, All Medium- Moderators: A. Tyng & C. Saper 5 09-26-2005 12:35 AM
Patricia, seated three quarters' length Carlos Ygoa Oil Critiques 6 06-02-2005 02:37 AM

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.