Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Digital cameras
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Old 03-06-2006, 09:42 PM   #1
Mike McCarty Mike McCarty is offline
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR
SOG Member
'03 Finalist Taos SOPA
'03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA
'03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA
'04 Finalist Taos SOPA
 
Mike McCarty's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
Focal Length Multiplier




In the olden days of 35mm film it was correct to accept that an 85mm (+-) focal length was the optimum for portraiture. For most digital SLR's that we discuss here (with the exception of a precious few costing many thousands of dollars) this benchmark 85mm focal length has been dropped to 57mm (85 / 1.5 = 57). This 1.5 FLM would be applied to my digital Nikon SLR, others, such as the Canon, would have a slightly different multiplier.

It is the size of the sensors (which vary slightly between manufactures), as they relate to the size of 35mm film, that brings about the need for this calculation.

The 85mm benchmark is now a relic of the days of film. All the optical attributes of the 85mm focal length have been transported to the new number: 57mm (+-). This is true whether you are using the new digital lenses or the lenses you used on your old 35mm film camera.

For a more in depth discussion of this subject you can refer to the following link:

http://www.dpreview.com/learn/?/key=...gth+multiplier
__________________
Mike McCarty
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2006, 09:41 AM   #2
Julie Deane Julie Deane is offline
Juried Member
 
Julie Deane's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Gainesville, GA
Posts: 1,298
Thank you, Mike, for making this clear. It will really help for the day when I can afford a digital SLR.

I had been thinking that the standard kit lens was too short (55 - 70 mm). Now it appears that it is actually the approximate equivalent of a 85 -105 (film) lens. As someone used to the old style lenses, this conversion info helps immeasurably.
__________________
Julie Deane
www.discerningeyeportraits.com
Member of Merit, Portrait Society of Atlanta
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2006, 10:23 PM   #3
Mike McCarty Mike McCarty is offline
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR
SOG Member
'03 Finalist Taos SOPA
'03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA
'03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA
'04 Finalist Taos SOPA
 
Mike McCarty's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
It's an unfortunate complication, but one that could not be avoided I suppose. Most people who use these cameras won't ever consider this obscure detail, but it's something for us to take note of. I think if I have to remember one more thing I'm going to pop.

As technology marches predictably forward, and the fact that a couple of the very high end cameras of today have a 1:1 conversion, the Focal Length Multiplier may also become a relic of the early days of digital. As Chief Dan George once said to the outlaw Jose Wales: "We must endeavor to persevere."
__________________
Mike McCarty
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Topic Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Full length portrait Julie Boyles Portrait Unveilings, All Medium- Moderators: A. Tyng & C. Saper 5 09-26-2005 12:35 AM
Patricia, seated three quarters' length Carlos Ygoa Oil Critiques 6 06-02-2005 02:37 AM

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.