 |
|
10-18-2002, 11:24 PM
|
#41
|
Juried Member PT 5+ years
Joined: Nov 2001
Location: Stillwater, MN
Posts: 1,801
|
. . . not to mention "Say it right [sic]".
|
|
|
10-19-2002, 12:26 AM
|
#42
|
SOG & FORUM OWNER
Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 2,129
|
I've always heard gee-clay, Enzie.
|
|
|
10-19-2002, 04:03 AM
|
#43
|
Juried Member PT 5+ years
Joined: Nov 2001
Location: Stillwater, MN
Posts: 1,801
|
. . . and to head this off, the "g" in giclee is soft, a bit more than the soft English g, more of a "zh". The best part about knowing the pronunciation of the second syllable is that now you'll confidently expound on the expressionist works of Swiss-born Paul Klee, no doubt one of the favorites among members, including closet modernists.
My spell-check software doesn't know "giclee" and suggests that I meant to type "girlie". It may be on to something. That's why I don't go to those mediums with the Ouija boards and Tarot cards. I have enough trouble with mindreaders at home.
|
|
|
10-19-2002, 09:29 AM
|
#44
|
SOG Member '02 Finalist, PSA '01 Merit Award, PSA '99 Finalist, PSA
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 819
|
In my Webster's Collegiate (online) both "a mode of artistic expression or communication" and "a liquid with which pigment is mixed by a painter" are listed as "plural media."
But hey, in your own studiae, you guys can work in or mix with whatever mediums you want.
As regards "hopefully," yeah I know, but I plan to use it that way it anyway. So sue me.
Best to all.
__________________
TomEdgerton.com
"The dream drives the action."
--Thomas Berry, 1999
|
|
|
10-19-2002, 09:47 AM
|
#45
|
Associate Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Port Elizabeth, NJ
Posts: 534
|
What is it about "hopefully" that excites opprobrium? Again, resorting to my trusty Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (a paper and cardboard copy, alas!) it lists, under "hopefully" "1: in a hopeful manner 2: it is hoped" with the addendum "usage Only the irrationally large amount of critical fire drawn by sense 2 of hopefully requires its particular recognition in a dictionary. Similar use of other adverbs (as interestingly, presumably, fortunately) as sentence modifiers is so commonplace as to excite no notice whatsoever. While it still arouses an occasional objection, hopefully as a sentence modifier has been in use at least since 1932 and is well established as standard."
Gotta love that Webster!
|
|
|
10-19-2002, 06:48 PM
|
#46
|
Juried Member PT 5+ years
Joined: Nov 2001
Location: Stillwater, MN
Posts: 1,801
|
Just a misfired joke, Leslie, that hopefully didn't alarm anyone. Having just defended "mediums" on the basis of usage in an evolving language, I meant to juxtapose the pedantic "opprobrium" visited upon the hapless "hopefully." I thought a discourse on adverbial disjuncts would not be read hopefully by most members.
Hey, Tom, taking your cue, I've just discovered that my online Webster's says that the plural is "mediums or media". Where are Funk & Wagnall when you need them? (Or is that, Where is Funk & Wagnall's when you need it?)
|
|
|
10-19-2002, 08:09 PM
|
#47
|
Associate Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Port Elizabeth, NJ
Posts: 534
|
Okay, now that we've hopefully put that one and its predecessor to bed, what is the take among Italian scholars on the proper pronunciation of our recently-withdrawn senatorial candidate's name, Torricelli? The media pronounce it "Torreselli," but I've heard arguments that the "c" should be a "ch," as in "cello." (Wow, got 'em both in!)
|
|
|
10-27-2002, 11:48 PM
|
#48
|
Inactive
Joined: Jan 2002
Location: Siloam Springs, AR
Posts: 911
|
Another one - fillet
Ok, I say fillet (fill-ah) -framers say (fill-it)
I think both are correct according to the dictionary-what do ya'll say?
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 AM.
|