Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Techniques, Tips, and Tools
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Old 05-22-2002, 09:42 PM   #31
Rebecca Alzofon Rebecca Alzofon is offline
Juried Member
FT Professional
 
Joined: May 2002
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Posts: 5



Quote:
Lon wrote: ...I doubt if this style would work well in most commissioned portraiture, however, since most customers (at least mine) do not want too much stylization and too much impressionism in line work and technique such as in the final post above.
I just want to clarify that the last Prud'hon drawing Karin posted (borrowed from my website) is a drawing abandoned in its early stage, before being refined. It was displayed here to indicate what a "stumped" drawing looked like *before* it gets stumped. Prud'hon made portraits for people in high positions; some were pastel, and quite nice, too. Not "stylized," or "impressionist." Once upon a time, any professional portrait artist spent their early years drawing posing nude models. It was an essential part of their development as artists. I hope that your remark about naked guys and their penises was only in jest. Prud'hon's style, as you see it applied to figure drawing, also served him very well in portrait drawing and for planning important large scale painting projects.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 03:33 AM   #32
Lon Haverly Lon Haverly is offline
Juried Member
FT Professional
 
Lon Haverly's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland
Posts: 698
Dear Rebecca,

Of course it was a jest. But only half. I never saw the necessity for drawing nude genetalia, or nudes for that matter. Purely an opinion, as I stated. I rather think it would serve the portrait artist better to study how fabric interacts with the human form, rather than drawing the nude. I have never had the necessity for drawing a nude figure, not to say that it would not be a pleasure.

I am not familiar with his work. I did not read the posts well enough - I was unaware that the drawing was incomplete. My point still can be made: impressionist styles that work well in figures or in works for yourself do not necessarily hone the skills for a commissioned portrait artist. That does not diminish the beauty and quality of his work in the least.

No disrespect intended. I am just a skeptic of the "nude" school of thought.
__________________
Lon Haverly www.lonhaverly.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 11:32 AM   #33
Mari DeRuntz Mari DeRuntz is offline
STUDIO & HISTORICAL MODERATOR
 
Mari DeRuntz's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: Southern Pines, NC
Posts: 487
I think what I get out of drawing/painting nude models is I can more clearly observe the underlying anatomy--bones and muscles are what determine how even the clothing falls on the model...

Although my own painting has a long way to go, I feel studying the nude is essential to my understanding portraiture.

Just a thought,
Mari
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 03:21 PM   #34
Lon Haverly Lon Haverly is offline
Juried Member
FT Professional
 
Lon Haverly's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland
Posts: 698
I am sure I am in the minority on ths issue!
__________________
Lon Haverly www.lonhaverly.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 09:17 PM   #35
Karin Wells Karin Wells is offline
FT Pro, Mem SOG,'08 Cert Excellence PSA, '02 Schroeder Portrait Award Copley Soc, '99 1st Place PSA, '98 Sp Recognition Washington Soc Portrait Artists, '97 1st Prize ASOPA, '97 Best Prtfolio ASOPA
 
Karin Wells's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Peterborough, NH
Posts: 1,114
Lon, I think that you might indeed be in the minority on the "nude study" issue.

However, who cares? You're a really nice guy. You paint well. And the thoughts and opinions you express on this forum enrich all of us.
__________________
Karin Wells

www.KarinWells.com

www.KarinWells.BlogSpot.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2002, 01:08 AM   #36
Lon Haverly Lon Haverly is offline
Juried Member
FT Professional
 
Lon Haverly's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland
Posts: 698
Ha ha!

Thanx, Karin! Fact is, I would be too shy to draw anybody in the nude. I always draw with my clothes on!
__________________
Lon Haverly www.lonhaverly.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2002, 01:14 AM   #37
Karin Wells Karin Wells is offline
FT Pro, Mem SOG,'08 Cert Excellence PSA, '02 Schroeder Portrait Award Copley Soc, '99 1st Place PSA, '98 Sp Recognition Washington Soc Portrait Artists, '97 1st Prize ASOPA, '97 Best Prtfolio ASOPA
 
Karin Wells's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Peterborough, NH
Posts: 1,114
LOL! Now why didn't I think of that....
__________________
Karin Wells

www.KarinWells.com

www.KarinWells.BlogSpot.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2002, 03:11 PM   #38
Rebecca Alzofon Rebecca Alzofon is offline
Juried Member
FT Professional
 
Joined: May 2002
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Posts: 5
Lon wrote:
Quote:
I rather think it would serve the portrait artist better to study how fabric interacts with the human form, rather than drawing the nude.
I teach drawing and painting, and I've seen how students are disinclined to study clothing with full, focused attention, even though it is integral to a finished portrait. They are, however, willing to give lots of attention to the human figure, and this has proven to be an excellent bridge to the study of other subject matter. Figure drawing and painting builds hardiness in artists' ability to focus, enabling them to address the plebeian things that they resisted earlier. Also, without full awareness of (and full respect for) the body beneath, artists will have trouble with the convincing clothed bodies of their sitters.
That said, I found it difficult to pursue my interest in [nude] figure painting between commissions in my publicly accessible portrait studio, for fear that puritanical shoppers might get their sensibilities bruised. It is ironic that this essential practice could scare away customers, but I've seen it happen.

--Rebecca Alzofon
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2002, 09:56 PM   #39
Lon Haverly Lon Haverly is offline
Juried Member
FT Professional
 
Lon Haverly's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland
Posts: 698
We had figure drawing whan I was a child in art school. Of course, it was not nude. I believe that children can be taught all the basics as I was taught. That requires that you clothe the models. We were very attentive to drawing from life, and I learned great lessons about the figure without the nude.

Figure drawing is essential, of course. Full nudity is not.
__________________
Lon Haverly www.lonhaverly.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2002, 10:31 PM   #40
Karin Wells Karin Wells is offline
FT Pro, Mem SOG,'08 Cert Excellence PSA, '02 Schroeder Portrait Award Copley Soc, '99 1st Place PSA, '98 Sp Recognition Washington Soc Portrait Artists, '97 1st Prize ASOPA, '97 Best Prtfolio ASOPA
 
Karin Wells's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Peterborough, NH
Posts: 1,114
There is a thread called "Nude or Naked?" at http://forum.portraitartist.com/show...=&threadid=679 that you guys might want to check out...
__________________
Karin Wells

www.KarinWells.com

www.KarinWells.BlogSpot.com
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.