Leanna monochrome

[Janel Maples]

Go here for a two week workshop demo of Marvin's method.

http://www.fineartportrait.com/workshop_demo_4.html

[Molly Sherrick Phifer]

I'm willing to bet that the teacher April had learned this technique from Louis Maestas or a student of his work. He uses the term "rub out" for his method, which he taught himself through the study of old master techniques. He is not a Frank Reilly protege, though the wipe out and wash in techniques are very similar.

Mr. Maestas creates finished works using this method as opposed to creating an underpainting over which to add color, make corrections, etc.

Click here to read about him and see some of his works online. He paints a painting a day and spends an average of 2-3 hours on one work. His works are often monochromatic (in the umbers or siennas) but he also will add color to the wet work and wipe out with that as well. He does not paint on top of his works. I believe he is still teaching in the Albuquerque NM area.

I had the opportunity to visit this gallery (link above) in person on a recent trip to Sedona, Arizona, and was most impressed with the work, particularly as a student of Marvin's. Marvin teaches a modified version of the Reilly method which does involve the use of a controlled palette, which Marvin has altered to include the Paxton flesh palette. He has multiple demonstrations on his website, here .

This is a really lovely work, April. I'm sure your husband's boss will be thrilled!

Dear Molly,
I appreciate your posting of info on Mr. Maestas. His technique appears very smilar to Reilly's. I do, however, know that Reilly was not the first to teach the so-called wash-in technique. It was particular to Reilly's instruction, yes, but he didn't pull anything out of thin air. Monochromatic means having a single (or limited) hue(s) involved. Almost all underpainting techniques are, therefore, "monochromatic". The uses of Burnt and/or Raw Umber is because they dry overnight, and, thus, can be painted over the next day without lifting. For that reason, the slower drying Siennas are generally not used at this stage.
Nice as Mr. Maestas work may be, without having met Reilly, he could still have learned Reilly's technique else where. He had hundreds of students!!
By the way, 'forgot to mention it last time, another teacher influenced by Reilly's instruction, a Mr. Thomas Ouellette. He studied under a former protege of Reilly, Michael Aviano. He used (and probably still does) to teach in Back Bay, Boston.
More info on: www.realistpainter.com
Enjoy,
a.

[Molly Sherrick Phifer]

Hi Albert,

I didn't mean to imply that Maestas didn't pick up Reilly's method. I can't really say. I did not speak to him personally, but was told by his agent that Maestas had learned this method through careful direct study of old masters techniques. I was just thinking that since he calls his technique "rub out" and does not use it as an underpainting (these are finished paintings), that it bore quite a similarity to what April appears to have been instructed in.

I personally love the look of paintings done this way. I am very tempted to do a series of these finished "rub out" paintings. I wish I had the opportunity to see someone in action who is using multiple colors in a rub out. I'm not sure how that would work! April, did your instructor ever show the technique with multiple colors? I think the reason that Maestas doesn't necessarily stick with just the umbers, is that he's not worried about painting on it the next day. He finishes in one day. Amazing. I wish there were more examples of the multi color rub outs on the website I posted, they are really beautiful to look at.

April, I hope you do more of these! I just love the look. I have a couple that I have done in Marvin's class, but I haven't come anywhere NEAR close to having one I could call a finished painting as I make so many drawing errors that I need to paint over.

Dear Molly,
Again, thanks for your input. I, briefly, at the commencement of my art education, studied the Reilly Method. With that, the wash-in was strictly an underpainting procedure. Full colors where applied over the top. In so doing, the drawing would continue to evolve. Errors should, thence, be corrected. A very traditional method, really.
What you describe as Maestas's procedure, while sounding very similar in some regards, is not the same. Putting all the colors down at once, is working alla prima, not traditionally. Both means have produced great works, but there are some crucial differences. Do you admire Bouguereau or Monet? Each are examples of those respective means, although, certainly, Monet usually spent more than a single day per peice.
I, personally, couldn't imagine how one could produce a beautiful painting in a single sitting using a rub-out technique. Maybe I just need to see more.

[April Phillips]

Originally Posted by Molly Sherrick Phifer

I'm willing to bet that the teacher April had learned this technique from Louis Maestas or a student of his work. He uses the term "rub out" for his method, which he taught himself through the study of old master techniques. He is not a Frank Reilly protege, though the wipe out and wash in techniques are very similar.

Mr. Maestas creates finished works using this method as opposed to creating an underpainting over which to add color, make corrections, etc.

Molly,

Thank you for your post. It was inspiring to see Maestas work and yes I do believe that's where this technique comes from. All my paintings are done with this method, however am am taking classes to learn techniques which use color. I'm posting a another portrait today, which is my husbands bosses other daughter. Thanks again for getting me that link. His work will inspire the rest of my paintings from here on out.