 |
|
03-04-2004, 05:43 PM
|
#11
|
Juried Member
Joined: May 2003
Location: Upton, WY
Posts: 24
|
Is this better?
I had to wipe out the hills behind her completely and start over. Do they recede enough?
|
|
|
03-04-2004, 06:08 PM
|
#12
|
SENIOR MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional, Author '03 Finalist, PSofATL '02 Finalist, PSofATL '02 1st Place, WCSPA '01 Honors, WCSPA Featured in Artists Mag.
Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,481
|
Yes, there's a much better sense of distance now.
|
|
|
03-04-2004, 06:34 PM
|
#13
|
Juried Member
Joined: May 2003
Location: Upton, WY
Posts: 24
|
Thank you Sharon, and Chris!
I agree!! It was worth the trouble for sure. I have learned a valuable lesson! Thanks so much!!
|
|
|
03-04-2004, 06:56 PM
|
#14
|
Approved Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,730
|
Bravery!
I agree with Chris, however,at the left bottom of the hills there is a rather sharp brown line, soften it as it makes the hills look somewhat detached from the water and floating. I think you could also scumble a tad more of the sky color over the hills to lighten them up a bit. All in all a good job overall!
|
|
|
03-04-2004, 07:53 PM
|
#15
|
Associate Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Port Elizabeth, NJ
Posts: 534
|
Karen, I think it's a much stronger painting now. I agree completely with Chris and Sharon that the background was competing too much with the child. As you have it now, minus that brown separating line, it creates a lovely mood and allows the viewer to focus on the child within a landscape, but not dominated by it. Nice work!
|
|
|
03-05-2004, 03:01 PM
|
#16
|
Juried Member
Joined: May 2003
Location: Upton, WY
Posts: 24
|
From good to great!
I think it has improved so much. I am really grateful for the help with it. I fixed the dark line on the left. One last photo of the finished product. Do you see anything about the baby that could be improved?
|
|
|
03-06-2004, 11:56 AM
|
#17
|
CAFE & BUSINESS MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460
|
Can't see anything about the baby that I'd change at first glance but what does jump out at me is the bottom ellipse of the bucket. It doesn't match the top ellipse of the bucket opening.
|
|
|
03-06-2004, 12:13 PM
|
#18
|
Juried Member
Joined: May 2003
Location: Upton, WY
Posts: 24
|
The bucket
That's not hard to fix. The bucket has been kind of like an afterthought next to all the other elements. I noticed yesterday after I photographed it that it looks pinched where she is holding the bucket , so I have fixed that. I am usually pretty aware of elipses and it bugs me when I see the "elipse" mistake in artwork. Thanks for the heads up. Karen
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 AM.
|