 |
|
06-09-2003, 04:48 PM
|
#1
|
SOG Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 49
|
The jury's out
Hi! I could use some help. This is the first pastel I've done since 1984, and I wasn't proud of that one either.
I've heard that pastels reproduce nicely as gicl
|
|
|
06-09-2003, 04:57 PM
|
#2
|
SOG Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 49
|
Here's the picture with the reference.
|
|
|
06-09-2003, 05:02 PM
|
#3
|
SOG Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 49
|
Here's a detail (top).
|
|
|
06-09-2003, 05:04 PM
|
#4
|
SOG Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 49
|
And here's another detail (bottom).
|
|
|
06-09-2003, 06:08 PM
|
#5
|
Associate Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 166
|
Cathleen,
Are you looking for a smooth blended look? The pencils don't seem to blend the way the sticks do.
|
|
|
06-09-2003, 08:27 PM
|
#6
|
Associate Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Port Elizabeth, NJ
Posts: 534
|
Catherine, I love the way you've handled the cloth of her dress and the way the feet and arms are coming out. Lovely color and texture. Your technique and use of the pastels is fine, in my opinion. My concerns are more subject and model-related. Right now her nose is too sharp, her head seems too pale and the features aren't sufficiently delineated, although I realize that this is a work in progress. But I also keep asking myself what the story of the painting is: why is she there against that background and in that position? Because of the colors you've used for the various components she doesn't really seem to fit into the world you've created for her. Perhaps that's the impression you're looking for, though.
|
|
|
06-09-2003, 08:46 PM
|
#7
|
CAFE & BUSINESS MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460
|
I like the drama and mystery of the deeply shaded interior space you have in the original source photo. I would go with that. Nice job on the fabric!
|
|
|
06-09-2003, 09:27 PM
|
#8
|
SOG Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 49
|
Michele and Leslie,
Thanks for your comments! To be honest, I tried to make up a "scene" to put the figure in, and it looks made up, doesn't it? Now, to get to a nice deep, say, velvety background, should I erase or try to scrape off the dumb background or cover it up directly, or then again, start over?
I'm at home with oil and graphite, so I'd know when I made a dud or when I could fix it with those two media; I suspect it'll take a lot of elbow grease to repair this one. Or is this when a soft pastel applied hard comes to the rescue?
|
|
|
06-09-2003, 09:53 PM
|
#9
|
Associate Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 166
|
What you're describing sounds like a waste of time to me. It may also damage the paper. I'd say keep what you've done for reference and start something new. You can do it differently. A new medium takes practice.
|
|
|
06-10-2003, 09:43 AM
|
#10
|
CAFE & BUSINESS MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460
|
I don't work enough with pastel to know if that background could be covered up. That's one of the reasons I work with oils: it's very forgiving of changes and it takes the same amount of time as working in other mediums. (Oh, and people will pay more for an oil painting!)
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 PM.
|