Ethics and art

[Sharon Knettell]

I sincerely believe, that they probably mean work that is being done, "under supervision" in a local mental health facility under the nervous eyes of medical professionals, as a form of art therapy, now currently in vogue.

If you are in fact happily dabbling away unchaperoned in your own studio, I would not worry too much.

As a matter of fact, Marvin told me Alicia Blue's ankles were too fat, when he saw her in Boston. I fixed them and now I have an interested client. Do you think I should give Marvin a percentage?

[Marvin Mattelson]

Sharon, at least 75% to be fair. My reasoning is as follows: what chance does a person have of standing on their own with problematic ankles? Therefore what chance is there of a painting standing on it's own with ankle problems? I'm not gonna haggle over a few percentage points. Please make it payable to "fineartportrait." No personal checks please!

[John Crowther]

It ultimately doesn't matter what we think, it's what competition organizers think. My best guess, from exposure to some of these folks, is that most of them are, surprise surprise, decent, logical, folks, but we're talking about the occasional nazi. Do you want to risk it? At the same time, do you want to ask if there's a possiblity you'll get shot down? But then, do you want to enter a contest with that kind of draconian attitude. I look at it this way, if I post for critiques it's not because I want everyone to say "wow, you have a winner," it's because I feel there's areas where I need help, which means I've already disqualified myself from entering a competition. If you have a painting that you think is a slam dunk winner, then enter the contest and post it later, possibly to ask why those so and so's didn't recognize my genius.

John C.

[Elizabeth Schott]

Wow, some people are really going to retire comfortably form this forum!

Wait until Cynthia takes her percentage too!

So you get money with these prizes aye?

[Kimberly Dow]

I totally agree with all of you! It would be utterly stupid for someone to say my paintings werent mine - or were supervised from the critiques I got here. I am not trying to be preoccupied or a stickler for rules.

The source of my information was not aiming it at me and actually told me that my changes were so small that no one could question it, but this person mentioned this as a situation that could be read as having help. This is someone who does shows and competitions and has judged them as well. If this person, as an artist feels this is an ethical/rules situation then there are probably more out there who would agree.

I think the chance of it happening is slim, and I am most-likely fine - but with the info coming on the heels of me receiving an award in a national competition...I figure its best to be safe.

Besides I can still post for a critique after a painting is done - and apply any of the abundant knowledge gained to the next piece. This will of course cut all of you out of the tremendous money-making plan of Kim-tries-competitions. I hope this doenst affect anyone's bottom line too drastically....I'd hate to think of you all going hungry.

[Jan Keeling]

That's a shame, Kim, why do you think I joined this forum? I was looking forward to the money stream I would get from offering comments on your work....

[Kimberly Dow]

Jan-

You and everyone else... man, I am sick of supporting all you bums.