Movie: Girl With a Pearl Earring

[Michele Rushworth]

I agree, it is a terrific movie. From what little I know of the art techniques of that period, it seemed very historically accurate too. The only thing I noticed that seemed out of place was the very large quantities of paint that Vermeer had mixed and laid out for the day. Considering the price of ingredients, the difficulty in grinding them and the way Vermeer painted, he wouldn't use that much paint in weeks! A wonderful movie, though.

[Tom Edgerton]

Haven't seen the movie, but loved the book. So I'm resisting seeing the movie for that reason.

In the book, the relationship was portrayed as master/servant, tho Vermeer began to see that she had a sensibility and an eye and he began to rely more on her opinion. Gradually, she became more of a colleague. But except for the slight tension/ attraction that naturally exists between all artists and their subjects, I didn't get from the book that Vermeer had any kind of full-blown sexual infatuation with her, or at least not one that he would act on.

I understand that Hollywood has spiced up this attraction somewhat and made it more overt. Hence my hesitancy to see it, as I liked the book so much.

From those who've seen it, what's your take on this?

For anyone who's not read it, it's a great read for artists. Full of vivid detail and a great feeling of daily life in that period. Also, a great feeling for how an artist politically handles his often coarse and uncomprehending patrons. I guess some things never change.

Best--TE