Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Photographing Your Artwork
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


 
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-24-2013, 10:34 AM   #1
Ant Carlos Ant Carlos is offline
Juried Member
 
Ant Carlos's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Ituiutaba-MG (interior of Brazil)
Posts: 63
Send a message via ICQ to Ant Carlos Send a message via Skype™ to Ant Carlos
Fooling your camera?




I'll start this new topic, although it is related to most of the old ones bellow, there's a new thing I would like to discuss separately. And I would certainly love to hear Mike's opinion.

As many of you, I work with long distance commissions and use photos to discuss the WIP with my clients. One thing that keeps bothering me is that the photo of my work never looks like the real one. Not even close. I try to adjust colors etc., of course, but it always seems to be worse than the painting in front of me. I assume people who work Alla Prima may have less problem, if at all. But my paintings are built with layers, with lots of transparency. To naked eye it makes very good 3D effects, which are all lost in the photos. I am pretty sure the cause is that the camera sees what our eyes cannot see. Like astrophotos that show colors in the sky, the camera shows some undesirable colors in my paintings. Sometimes subtle ones, but it really bothers me. So yesterday I did a test and put my hand in front of the painting I am currently working and took a shot. Somehow the presence of my real flesh tones made the flesh in the portrait look more natural. I started to believe that the CCD of the camera calculates an average when shooting. So when you shoot only the painting it calculates every spot of colors that it sees (remembering it sees much more than our eyes) and produces unreal results.

OK, I know it sounds a bit confusing so let me show you what I am trying to bring out. The first image is a photo of the painting in progress (the best I could manage to get) with it filling the whole field at the moment of the shot. The second one was taken with my hand in front of the painting. See if you find how the 2nd one looks more natural.

http://antcarlos.com.br/upload/regina-wip5.jpg

http://antcarlos.com.br/upload/regina-compare.jpg

So now I wonder if this is a nice method to fool the camera when taking pics to discuss with clients. Of course I'll have to go through other tests, but I am sharing with you. Maybe someone out there has the same problem.

Ant
__________________
www.antcarlos.com.br
  Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Topic Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nikon D50 Camera Molly Sherrick Phifer Digital cameras 47 02-05-2007 01:11 PM
How my Digital Camera Helps My Art Julie Deane Digital cameras 3 06-20-2004 05:12 AM
Photographing your art to gallery standards Cynthia Houppert Photographing Your Artwork 3 10-02-2003 08:53 PM
Minolta DiMAGE 7 camera Will Enns Digital cameras 8 03-24-2003 02:38 AM
Another Digital Camera Question... Mary Sparrow Digital cameras 3 11-10-2001 03:10 PM

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.