Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Member Portraits from Life
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


 
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-03-2007, 11:35 AM   #8
Thomasin Dewhurst Thomasin Dewhurst is offline
'06 Artists Mag Finalist, '07 Artists Mag Finalist, ArtKudos Merit Award Winner '08
 
Thomasin Dewhurst's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: U.K.
Posts: 732
Thank-you for your comments, Sharon. I am always very pleased to hear from you, and educated and very encouraged by what you have to say.

I am not sure, though, what you mean here:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharon Knettell
However, making a face and that lives, breathes and communicates and paint that lives as well is not the end all and be all of draughtmanship. Realism and realistic are two very different things.
Do you mean that you don't feel a face well-drawn and painted with truly felt and animated marks is near what we're aiming for? Are you saying that a David-like clean, smooth painting is just as good (which it can be, of course, I fully agree. I just am personally no good at doing David-like paintings; and I tried and tried). What is the difference, in your opinion, between realism and realistic? I am not arguing here, I am just hoping to clarify your meaning.

Carlos, it's always nice to be agreed with - you feel you are on some sort of "right" track. It's especially good to be agreed with by you. Thank-you for your (very articulate) comments. I also do my sketches and idea working-outs on the actual canvas and draw with tones (rather than outlines) to get a sense of solidity - it's so important - solidity, that is. If the character or composition or physiognomy looks off, it 99% due, I think, to erroneous rendering of space and form. And if you have a sense of form, I feel, even the sketchiest marks and the most distorted face look solid and finished.

I am starting to put in outlines as a compositional element - yay! I love bits of outlines, like Degas, who (with Picasso - thanks heavens he existed because he allows so much freedom and unfinishedness), I must admit, is one of my most returned-to influences. Now I am rambling, but rambling is a bit like beginnings of paintings - it shows where you are as a thinker and writer.

Alex, thank-you again, so much for your continued support. It goes a very, very long way to increasing my confidence and experimenting, and with the influence of your own excellent works I feel I am sailing along very well indeed.

I will start that thread you suggested just as soon as I've posted this.
__________________
Thomasin
www.thomasindewhurst.com
  Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Topic Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Go for excellence in portraiture William Whitaker Creativity Issues - 76 05-22-2008 04:08 PM
Wall Street Journal article on presidential portraiture Cynthia Daniel Portrait World News 43 02-09-2007 11:33 AM
Photo legal issues Patt Legg Business, Marketing & PR 52 02-06-2007 08:25 PM
The Animated Society Portrait Karin Wells Cafe Guerbois Discussions - Moderator: Michele Rushworth 0 12-28-2004 07:56 PM
Portrait Society of Atlanta - 25th Anniversay speech Cynthia Daniel Questions and Comments about the Societies & Their Events 2 11-07-2004 04:10 PM

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.