 |
|
07-27-2002, 02:25 AM
|
#1
|
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR SOG Member '03 Finalist Taos SOPA '03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA '03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA '04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
|
You better Belize it
I have pondered the questions regarding outdoor photography and believe I have come across a couple of factors which can enhance your chances. First, buy a ticket to Belize. Second, convince the prettiest girl you know to go with you.
__________________
Mike McCarty
|
|
|
07-27-2002, 02:27 AM
|
#2
|
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR SOG Member '03 Finalist Taos SOPA '03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA '03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA '04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
|
another...
__________________
Mike McCarty
|
|
|
07-27-2002, 02:36 AM
|
#3
|
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR SOG Member '03 Finalist Taos SOPA '03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA '03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA '04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
|
Who among us would like to take this guy on? This is a local named Doctor Warpo. A self described "white rasta."
All the photos I took show what uncontrollable light does. It bounces, reflects and comes back in fairly complex ways. You can position your subject just so much. You are ultimately under the control of Mother Nature. Arguably, if I were trying to create a different looking photograph, I could have used a fill flash. But I was trying to leave the shadows and have the best of both worlds.
Of course it would be totally off subject to show the bikini shot.
__________________
Mike McCarty
|
|
|
07-27-2002, 02:56 AM
|
#4
|
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR SOG Member '03 Finalist Taos SOPA '03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA '03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA '04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
|
This sweet looking soul, when I raised my camera to take the shot, threw her hand up to her chin as if to "strike a pose."
__________________
Mike McCarty
|
|
|
07-27-2002, 03:00 AM
|
#5
|
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR SOG Member '03 Finalist Taos SOPA '03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA '03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA '04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
|
Last one for now, unless someone begs for the bikini shot.
__________________
Mike McCarty
|
|
|
07-27-2002, 07:36 AM
|
#6
|
Associate Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Posts: 43
|
Hi, Mike! These would all be great paintings, in my humble opinion. I'm curious to know how you would handle the glasses on the first hat lady. (Love her hat and pose.) I've wanted to paint some of my relatives that wear glasses and always find that the most difficult thing to do.
|
|
|
07-27-2002, 12:08 PM
|
#7
|
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR SOG Member '03 Finalist Taos SOPA '03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA '03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA '04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
|
Doreen,
The glasses would be a challenge for me. I think that it could be done but it may be above my pay grade. I think a lot of people would pass on this photo because of the glasses. There is information written on the do's and don't's of photographing people with glasses. The really tough ones are the large thick lenses which magnify and distort the eyes. I wish I had asked her to take them off.
I took only this one picture of the first hat lady. The one I was trying to get was the black lady. As I was taking some shots of her, she took me over to her friend, the first hat lady.
This next photo was close, but there is something about the way she is holding her mouth that doesn't look natural.
__________________
Mike McCarty
|
|
|
07-27-2002, 12:23 PM
|
#8
|
SENIOR MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional, Author '03 Finalist, PSofATL '02 Finalist, PSofATL '02 1st Place, WCSPA '01 Honors, WCSPA Featured in Artists Mag.
Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,481
|
Oh, Mike, you are SO good!
I like the first post best! Perhaps you could repost that image in the "Photographing your subject" topic, as well as describing the light, time of day, how you managed to place your subject against such a strong backlight without losing any information, etc. (You know I just like to think up extra things to ask people to do on a Saturday morning.)
Administrator's note: Mike has posted details on the photgraphy of his subject at http://forum.portraitartist.com/show...threadid=1048. Thank you, Mike, great post.
|
|
|
07-27-2002, 01:46 PM
|
#9
|
PHOTOGRAPHY MODERATOR SOG Member '03 Finalist Taos SOPA '03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA '03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA '04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
|
Belize in yourself
All these little sayings regarding Belize are from the backs of my new T-shirts.
At Ms. Saper's suggestion, I have posted here one of the photos from my recent trip to Belize.
Since getting involved in these photo discussions, I have been giving more thought to just how I go about taking photos. No one ever asked before, so I didn't give it much thought. The thing that has surprised me a little is just how much I plan things out in my mind before I ever pick up the camera or approach the subject. I am constantly viewing the world with an opportunistic eye, not fully conscious that I am doing it until my eye latches onto that something.
In the case of this image, the thing that I latched onto was the color of the coconuts on the palm tree just off our front porch. I wanted that color and the abstraction of that image in the background of my subject. I began to formulate a plan for the photo immediately after that. Being more conscious of my thoughts, my mind composed that picture for 2 days before I suggested it to my friend. When she finally perched on the rail of the porch it was over in less than 5 minutes.
As you astutely point out, Chris, the challenge was the strong back lighting. But it was at midday that the sun would strike these coconuts and provide the glow that I liked. So I tried to use it to my advantage.
I use a film camera, a Nikon N90s. I try never to use a flash. This could have been a case for fill flash but I think you would have gotten a much different look. The film was ordinary Kodak 200 asa. The camera I use is not a new model, but it is a solid featured camera just under the professional grade. I think the body alone a few years ago was $750. Cameras today are half the price and just as well featured.
The feature which allowed me to get the detail in the face with strong back lighting was the "spot meter." Most all cameras have multiple metering systems. Mine has three. The first is a matrix system, which looks at the entire scene from top to bottom corner to corner and breaks down the frame into maybe 9 or a dozen independent sections. With the input you give the camera re: film speed, focus distance etc., its brain will go through a fairly complex calculus to try to make a well-balanced exposure. And it does a remarkable job, but had I used it, my subject would have been in darkness. The next metering option is called "center weighted metering" this forgets the edges and figures the exposure based on the center 1/4 (+-) of the viewfinder. Personally, my thinking is if I don't want the first option, I might as well go to the third which is the one that produced this picture "spot metering."
Spot metering allows you to create an "exposure" based only on the information in the center spot of the viewfinder. In my viewfinder, I place the center spot on that part of the subject that I want to expose for. I then lock in that exposure, recompose the scene and shoot. This most often will produce an over-exposed background situation. But you don't care, and in fact this can add to the illusion.
But technically speaking this is not tough duty. I place my camera in program portrait mode. By doing this I know the camera will select an open aperature, which will create the depth of field and the background that I want. I don't have to think about that anymore. I can make this adjustment to spot meter and back in one second. The trick, as you know Chris, is to recognize the problem in advance and plan for it.
And, as Vito Corleone said in The Godfather, "Someday, and that day may never come, I will learn to paint these images and then you guys can watch out." I think that's what he said.
__________________
Mike McCarty
|
|
|
07-27-2002, 03:24 PM
|
#10
|
Juried Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: Overton, NV
Posts: 79
|
Prettiest Girl?
I have one question: which pretty girl was the one you asked to go with you? And I love all the photos, but I too love the first one the best!
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:44 PM.
|