 |
|
11-20-2006, 11:32 PM
|
#1
|
Juried Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 57
|
Photo critique
I would appreciate any critiques on this photo for a 36 x 22" portrait.
Thank you!
|
|
|
11-21-2006, 05:54 AM
|
#2
|
Juried Member FT Professional
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Bad Homburg, Germany
Posts: 707
|
Jan, I think you have something here. As is it can work fine.
Please accept my suggestions with a grain of salt. I personally would turn her head just a touch more towards the window to give the face a bit more light and less shadow. Also I would ask her for that far away, deep in thought look. Then again the executive look can work fine and better with more light. The right hand could be positioned nicely on her right leg and her left hand on her nice colorful shall. Or if it is a executive look a paper in the left hand.
|
|
|
11-21-2006, 09:07 AM
|
#3
|
Juried Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 57
|
Thank you for your thoughtful suggestions, Mischa. I took a gazillion photographs. Here are a couple more.
|
|
|
11-21-2006, 05:12 PM
|
#4
|
UNVEILINGS MODERATOR Juried Member
Joined: May 2005
Location: Narberth, PA
Posts: 2,485
|
Jan, I like the position on the left with the head on the right.
|
|
|
11-22-2006, 11:03 AM
|
#5
|
CAFE & BUSINESS MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460
|
Can you post the alternate photos at full size?
The first one seems a bit stiffly posed and I'm not sure what she's looking at just above our heads to the left. This gaze gives the subject an aloof distance from the viewer. Not sure if that's what you want.
Most portraits I see have a definite reason for the subject to be looking where they are: either at the viewer, or distinctly "off camera" in order to show a strong profile or thoughtful contemplative pose.
|
|
|
11-22-2006, 02:00 PM
|
#6
|
Juried Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 57
|
Done.
|
|
|
11-22-2006, 02:15 PM
|
#7
|
CAFE & BUSINESS MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460
|
Maybe the first pose but with the second face (though she's not quite looking at the viewer in that pose either.)
I once did a portrait session with a boy during which his dad was present (my mistake). In every shot the boy was looking at his dad, over my shoulder, and not at the camera. I couldn't use the vast majority of poses because of that.
|
|
|
11-22-2006, 02:38 PM
|
#8
|
Juried Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 57
|
Thanks, Michele. I didn't even think about the gaze in that first pose. Obviously.
|
|
|
11-22-2006, 04:18 PM
|
#9
|
Juried Member FT Professional
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Bad Homburg, Germany
Posts: 707
|
I agree with Alex on this one (photo two with head from photo three). I would lower the chin if you choose photo three in the pose as Alex suggested, adjust the head, so she is not looking up, rather ahead, as if the window is directly in front.
|
|
|
11-22-2006, 07:05 PM
|
#10
|
Juried Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 388
|
What does this lady want this portrait for? Is she an executive who will have it hang in the corporate office? If so have her look directly at the viewer which will emphasize her authority. For the family fireplace the direction of the gaze is less important.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 AM.
|