![]() |
Robert Genn Newsletter
I found this most interesting and helpful, thought it should be shared here:
From the Robert Genn Twice Weekly Newsletter: Last weekend I attended an exhibition of the work of a wide range of painters. A lot of it was photo-derived--some of it really crackerjack--others not so hot. Why is it that some people can take photographic reference and make it exciting, while others only succeed in reproducing a photo? A lot of it has to do with the analysis that an artist gives to the reference prior to picking up the brush. Here are a few ideas you might find useful: When you're looking at a photo that you think might be made into a painting, clarify in your mind what was the main area or interest in the photo that attracted you in the first place. Will this focus area make the transition into paint? Which areas are worth keeping and which are to be left out? Will other elements need to be added? How and where can more "spirit" be added to this reference material? How can the final work be made to sing? Now spend some time hunting down and making decisions about the innocent weaknesses in the photo that can lead to "photoism" in paintings. These may include lineups, convergence, homeomorphism, dead shadows, poor composition, detail overkill, amorphous and formless elements and problem areas in general. Sort out the elements that don't look right and that will have to be re-designed. Also, don't let yourself be distracted by colour. Local colour is often arbitrary and can be changed. In your mind's eye, reduce your reference to black and white or some other narrow range. Now make a decision about an efficient order that you might work your way through. This requires sitting, looking and thinking. Focal areas--particularly difficult focal areas--ought frequently to be tackled first in order to give courage to the balance. On the other hand, an overall monochromatic lay-in goes a long way toward solving future problems. I believe in a holistic approach--here, there, everywhere, like a bee going to flowers. As well as the above, it's a fresh and painterly look that shoots down the photo-paralysis, but that's probably just a personal prejudice. Photos, when processed through a creative mind, are the finest of servants. When they take control they can become miserable and demanding masters that are capable of ruining an otherwise joyous day. Have a good one. Best regards, Robert PS: "One way to get "beyond the photo" is to take a lot of photos of one subject. This helps you to see all the nuances as if you were painting from life." (Theresa Bayer) |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.