Thanks, Linda. I love crowing triumphantly!

THIS was easy to find, once I knew what search terms to employ.

Stop The Presses!!!
 

Read this:
http://www.artslaw.org/OWNCOPY.HTM

This is something important to know if you get a printer to print giclees for you...

Wow, Cindy-- Thanks for the heads up on the giclees!

A note on state sales tax.

I visited two CPA's and two lawyers and was advised by both that the North Carolina law reads that portrait work is consider a service and is not taxable BUT that the state more often than not will rule against their own reading.

To further explain this anomoly I have two friends that are professional photographers. They both told me their tale of listening to their accountants and how they also called the state for their input on sales tax. They were advised that they need not charge sales tax. After a year of business they were both contacted by the state claiming they were owed back sales tax. When told of their status and the advice they received, the state ignored their protests and insisted they pay, which they did.

Needless to say, I am following my lawyers advice to collect and pay sales tax regardless.

This thread has split into two very distinct topics, privacy rights and sales tax. Here's my hip-shot on the former.

As has been suggested (regarding privacy rights), there is no black letter law or boilerplate language that will apply across the board. Not only is each state free to impose its own requirements (within, of course, constitutional limits), but this is an area of law that is ever developing, or perhaps

Steven, I would be very interested in any recent case law that you discover.

Well, rats, I haven

What quickly becomes apparent upon even a brief attempt to nail down this mass of gelatin is that even a survey of the law would require a small treatise. I can

Wow.

These cases are very illuminating. It says that the law is very mutable, and subject to interpretation as each particular judge sees fit.

The only one that surprised me was the First amendment case where it was considered parody of the judge. Since the artist wasn't a journalist, there was no editorial content to the painting of the judge in horns, so I'm surprised at that ruling.

I love your analogy of the blackjack hand. I think it's very apropos.

So no painting parade scenes, then, without first going to each person in your photo and obtaining their written authorization to use their likeness! DARN.