Portrait Artist Forum

Portrait Artist Forum (http://portraitartistforum.com/index.php)
-   Cafe Guerbois Discussions - Moderator: Michele Rushworth (http://portraitartistforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=21)
-   -   Portraits v. Landscape v. Still Life? (http://portraitartistforum.com/showthread.php?t=333)

Alexandra Tyng 06-16-2005 10:04 PM

Hmmm, what an interesting thread. I just joined the forum and I'm still exploring all the sections. This topic struck me because I'm one of the minority who is a portrait and landscape painter, but not a still life painter.

I don't like to keep doing the same thing over and over again. I hate routines. For me, going back and forth between portraits and landscapes is refreshing, liberating, and joyful. Portraits take a lot more concentration and focus, especially when one is getting the likeness just right. So after all that intensity I just have to break out and do an expansive, fun painting. I enjoy painting land forms, water, trees, architecture, clouds, the works. I've been flying in helicopters and single-engine planes to take reference photos for very large (36 x 64 sometimes) aerial views of the Philadelphia cityscape and landscapes of the Maine coast and islands. Painting these aerial views keeps me busy all winter. Between the portraits, of course!

As for still life, I realized that I often incorporate still life into portraits. In fact, I get fired up about painting flowers or porcelain or glass or whatever when it is part of a composition. It's just that I, personally, find painting just a still life boring. No offense to the majority here who do enjoy it. I love looking at still life paintings, I just don't like to paint them.

Thanks to the person who started this topic. I never stopped to think about it before.

Alex

Mikael Melbye 06-18-2005 12:01 PM

Dear Allan,
 
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Allan Rahbek
Dear Mikael,
I found a good illustration on the use of two colors in this painting by Corot.
His "Bridge at Narni" shows that he used Ochers and Blue for most of the picture. The greens in the trees are probably also made from those basic pigments.

Note also the great importance of the values.

The other painting is from Rome. How would that motive look now ?

Best Allan

You dog you! Making me post my lousy landscape next to a Corot. :)

Anyway, your angle certainly gave me a push in the right direction, so thanks for that. Even before I saw the Corot's, I thought a lot on what you said with the two colors, and actually went back a lot to the subject without colors and easel, just to sit and see. The first day I was up there, the weather was extremely clear, and there was no aerial perspective at all, but the day after your last comment there was, and here is the result with a lot of yellow ochre and cerulean blue mixed with ultramarine violet that really made the ochre sing.

Something else happened which I have to share with you: I got an exhibition in a very prestigious gallery in Rome in September! :sunnysmil

Now, if that is not great news, I don't know.

All the best

Mikael

Michele Rushworth 06-18-2005 12:59 PM

Congrtatulations on your upcoming gallery show in Rome. Wish I could be there to see it!

Allan Rahbek 06-18-2005 06:20 PM

Dear Mikael,
I am so happy for your luck in Rome, congratulations with the show.

About the two colors, that is a theory that I

Alexandra Tyng 06-18-2005 11:00 PM

Mikael and Allan, thanks for showing your landscapes. They are wonderful. Linda, can we see some images of yours? It is very exciting that a gallery picked up on them so quickly. And congratulations on your commission. I am always curious to see the work of other artists who do portraits and landscapes.

By the way, I also do not put people in my landscapes. I think I like the feeling of looking into a scene and imagining myself there. If I see other people already in the scene, then the space "within" the canvas seems to belong to them.

Alex

Mikael Melbye 06-19-2005 09:26 AM

Dear Allan,
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Allan Rahbek
A thought about the areal perspective: Would it not be more dense and therefore a lighter blue in the shadows of the far trees than the closer?

Allan

Yes, normally it would, but these trees are almost the same distance away. They are right in front of one another. The top one (the pines) are darker in foliage then the ones at the bottom, and therefor look bluer if you will in the shadow.

Best,

Mikael

Alexandra Tyng 06-19-2005 09:54 AM

Some of my work
 
3 Attachment(s)
Here is one of my portraits and two landscapes. If they don't post I'll try again.

Allan Rahbek 06-19-2005 02:28 PM

Two colors
 
4 Attachment(s)
Dear Mikael, and all others,

Here comes some details from a painting, a portrait of my garden.
I often find details more interesting than the whole thing, and also have a theory on why !

Why, is because the detail is not limited to it

Alexandra Tyng 06-19-2005 04:29 PM

What Lovely details, Allan. The paint is lucious! I would like to see the whole thing, too. Even though it is less interesting to you, it is interesting to me because I need to see the whole thing to appreciate the details in context. Also, the relationship of the details to the whole is informative because it answers the question: "How did he DO that?"
When I look at other artists' work I always like to know, if you are willing to share the information.

Alex

Mikael Melbye 06-20-2005 03:59 AM

Dear Allan,
 
[QUOTE=Allan Rahbek]Dear Mikael, and all others,

Here comes some details from a painting, a portrait of my garden.
I often find details more interesting than the whole thing, and also have a theory on why !

Why, is because the detail is not limited to it


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.