Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Cafe Guerbois Discussions - Moderator: Michele Rushworth

Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Old 01-14-2009, 01:46 PM   #1
Mike McCarty Mike McCarty is offline
SOG Member
'03 Finalist Taos SOPA
'03 HonMen SoCal ASOPA
'03 Finalist SoCal ASOPA
'04 Finalist Taos SOPA
Mike McCarty's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,674
Photo vs Painted Portrait

After reading the thread "Mind Boggling Proposal" I was reminded of a inquiry I got a couple of years ago from an anonymous source. I never got around to posting my response here. Although not completely to the subject it does touch around the edges of the matter.

The following is the e-mail inquiry followed by my response:

"I'm writing to ask if you could forward information explaining the aesthetic value of an oil portrait, as compared to a photograph of the subject. In other words, what is it about an oil portrait that elevates and justifies its higher price?"

Thank you for your attention,

Dear ,

Given the fact that there are lousy photographs, as well as bad painted portraits, I speak here only of quality work.

As you probably know, people have been taking photographs for well over a hundred years, and yet, during that time the photograph has done little to replace the painted portrait as one of the highest forms of human expression.

There are many reasons for this, not the least of which is that a photograph is the product of a mechanical device done in a split second. The hundredth copy is just as good as the original. Anyone with a finger and quality equipment can snap off a dozen in a tenth of a minute. A photo is a recording, a documentation of an individual. This comes in handy for all manner of projects such as passports, yearbooks, weddings and the like. If what you want is documentation then a photo fits the bill very well.

A painted portrait, however, is much more. A painted portrait is at its least a hand made original, a one of a kind. But it
Attached Images
Mike McCarty
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009, 02:33 PM   #2
Mary Ann Archibald Mary Ann Archibald is offline
Juried Member
Mary Ann Archibald's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Halifax, Canada
Posts: 63
Nice response.

I think once a person has been bitten by the richness that can be expressed with paint, it is very hard to be satisfied with a photograph.
my website || my book
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009, 03:23 PM   #3
Michele Rushworth Michele Rushworth is offline
SOG Member
FT Professional
Michele Rushworth's Avatar
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460
This is terrific, Mike!

I've been reading about your travels and travails -- I hope things work out well for you in Tulsa!
Michele Rushworth
  Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Topic Tools Search this Topic
Search this Topic:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Topic Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Go for excellence in portraiture William Whitaker Creativity Issues - 76 05-22-2008 04:08 PM
Photo legal issues Patt Legg Business, Marketing & PR 52 02-06-2007 08:25 PM
Portrait Society of Atlanta - 25th Anniversay speech Cynthia Daniel Questions and Comments about the Societies & Their Events 2 11-07-2004 04:10 PM
Photo portrait tips Mike McCarty Lighting & Photographing for Portraiture 8 08-23-2002 09:44 PM


Make a Donation

Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.