Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Resource Photo Critiques
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Old 03-07-2003, 10:50 PM   #31
Leslie Ficcaglia Leslie Ficcaglia is offline
Associate Member
 
Leslie Ficcaglia's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Port Elizabeth, NJ
Posts: 534



Michele, those are beautiful examples of outdoor portraits. I agree that they're definitely something to emulate. Several of my own have a similar look in terms of lighting, and you may find that the finished portrait of the mayor is a lot more even in illumination than my reference photo. I've found that photos very much exaggerate shadows so I've learned to compensate. But I'll have to take a look at Zou's portfolio. And I certainly appreciate all the suggestions from the forum.

Beth, thanks for trying out some alternatives; I certainly like the teal better but I'm viewing the red as a challenge and will go with that. I mentioned wearing another color to my subject when I went back for the second session, but she really wanted red. So I'll try to make it work.
__________________
Leslie M. Ficcaglia
Minnamuska Creek Studio
LeslieFiccaglia.org
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2003, 09:29 AM   #32
Karin Wells Karin Wells is offline
FT Pro, Mem SOG,'08 Cert Excellence PSA, '02 Schroeder Portrait Award Copley Soc, '99 1st Place PSA, '98 Sp Recognition Washington Soc Portrait Artists, '97 1st Prize ASOPA, '97 Best Prtfolio ASOPA
 
Karin Wells's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Peterborough, NH
Posts: 1,114
Leslie, you said:
Quote:
but it's very much in the style I've carved out for myself.
and
Quote:
,,,it's just not my style.
I am confused, what do you mean by "style" and how does it dictate your approach to a painting?

Your adherence to "style" really seems to have interfered with "quality." The photo reference section of this Forum is the one place where all of us - both pro and beginner alike - are pretty much on the same footing. Taking pictures is just plain hard work. Unlike handling a brush, rudimentary knowlege of handling a camera is simply not beyond anybody's skill level. To take a poor picture and delude yourself that it is OK for any reason will probably get in the way of ever making a quantum leap in the quality of your work.

"Mayor of the Year" sounds like a verrrrry important commission and a lot of people will probably see your painting and it could do a lot for your career as a painter. Right?

I'd hate to see you do anything less than what I know you are capable of. Some people who do not know how to take a decent photo will hire a professional photographer to take the photo for them. At the very least they are assured of decent reference material and the cost of this is factored into the fee.

For example, there is nothing basically wrong with the Mayor's red shirt, it is just the way that you photographed it that doesn't flatter her. She is also an attractive woman, but that is not enhanced in your picture either.

I also don't discount the possability that you may surprise me, manage to compensate for such a poor photo, and really paint a portrait of her that knocks my sox off...I hope so.
__________________
Karin Wells

www.KarinWells.com

www.KarinWells.BlogSpot.com
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.