Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Cafe Guerbois Discussions - Moderator: Michele Rushworth
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Old 07-10-2003, 10:28 AM   #11
Michele Rushworth Michele Rushworth is offline
CAFE & BUSINESS MODERATOR
SOG Member
FT Professional
 
Michele Rushworth's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460



Tim, yes there's kind of a soft whispered "r", in the pronunciation of "Ingres" but I don't know how to spell that in English.
__________________
Michele Rushworth
www.michelerushworth.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 10:35 AM   #12
Linda Brandon Linda Brandon is offline
Juried Member
 
Linda Brandon's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,734
Marvin, if you know off the top of your head where exactly the Paxton is located at the Met, and I'll bet you do, can you post it? Paintings aren't always where they're supposed to be, I've learned.

Michele, I am outraged to learn that I was in Seattle and missed seeing a Raeburn! Don't tell me it was at SAM, which was (depressingly) full of things like old clothes on the floor with buttons artfully scattered about.

Linda
__________________
www.LindaTraceyBrandon.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 10:36 AM   #13
Timothy C. Tyler Timothy C. Tyler is offline
Inactive
 
Timothy C. Tyler's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Location: Siloam Springs, AR
Posts: 911
A couple of observations (seriously), The Paxton is indeed very good. Now, those last two posted portraits rather look alike huh? This era produced paintings with great surfaces and depth and light and form, but sometimes the compositions were less than exciting or even new.

Lawrence was sweet, Renoir with more finish? I have problems with the area between the girls faces. The dark is a confusing shape at the profile where it slides into other girl's clothes. I sense he meant the near girl to be looking at her sister but the eyes don't focus. I mean no offense to any fans out there.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 01:34 PM   #14
Marvin Mattelson Marvin Mattelson is offline
SOG Member
FT Professional
'04 Merit Award PSA
'04 Best Portfolio PSA
'03 Honors Artists Magazine
'01 Second Prize ASOPA
Perm. Collection- Ntl. Portrait Gallery
Perm. Collection- Met
Leads Workshops
 
Marvin Mattelson's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Location: Great Neck, NY
Posts: 1,093
Linda,

Go to the Sargent area in the American wing. This is at one end of a long corridor like gallery. At the other end is the Eakins area. About halfway down on the left hand side is the opportunity to experience a level of perfection rarely if ever approached by mere mortals. The Paxton is quiet and small and surrounded by larger more boldly painted works. It is easy to just pass it buy. Be careful to call and make sure that gallery is open because it is closed one or two days during the week. They rotate the guards. It's always open on Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays.

Michele,

The lack of emotional attachment in Ingres paintings is a function of his disinterest not a lack of ability so I don
__________________
Marvin Mattelson
http://www.fineartportrait.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 02:01 PM   #15
Michele Rushworth Michele Rushworth is offline
CAFE & BUSINESS MODERATOR
SOG Member
FT Professional
 
Michele Rushworth's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460
Linda, the Seattle Art Museum (SAM) often does have some good stuff hidden away in the last room, after you walk quickly past the atrocious stuff in the main galleries. They recently had a show with works by Sargent, Hals, Van Dyke and Raeburn. For anyone out in this area, THE museum to go to for realist painting in Seattle is really the Frye, though.

Marvin, I'm with you on Renoir. I never liked his stuff. Mush is the right word.

I will hold to my opinion on Ingres though. A lack of heart and soul in a painting is still a fault, in my view. I'm sure he could have created works with more emotion. Too bad he didn't feel like it.
__________________
Michele Rushworth
www.michelerushworth.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 05:59 PM   #16
Peter Jochems Peter Jochems is offline
Juried Member
'02 Finalist, Artists Mag
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 276
Michele and Marvin,

If Renoir was a clumsy and muddy painter, I wish I was as clumsy as Renoir. this painting is so alive! To me, one of the great paintings of the world (I'm sorry to be a little off-topic here, this one is not in the Met)

Peter

P. S. If Bouguereau knocks on the door I will give him my brushes to wash And he may clean my palette too!
Attached Images
 
__________________
www.peterjochems.nl
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 07:29 PM   #17
Michele Rushworth Michele Rushworth is offline
CAFE & BUSINESS MODERATOR
SOG Member
FT Professional
 
Michele Rushworth's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460
Peter, your work (like your portrait of Rene, for example) is better than that Renoir, in my opinion!
__________________
Michele Rushworth
www.michelerushworth.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 07:59 PM   #18
SB Wang SB Wang is offline
SOG Member
FT Professional
 
SB Wang's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 587
The proletarians...unite, (and vote for)

Rembrandt:

Karl Marx or Engels said, (not exact words)
"If someone finally dipicted, in Rembrandt's strong light, the breathing images of revolutionary leaders, that would be wonderful!"
__________________
www.portraitartist.com/wang
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2003, 11:50 PM   #19
Denise Hall Denise Hall is offline
Associate Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 176
More than reality

Referring back to the statements that claim that great painting is the copying of what is in front of one (or in the photo one is copying) and do-able in paint - that is called "COPYING".

Now, painting, as in Art, is the enhancement of reality, creation of the illusion of reality, making it more than the real color, more than the real person, more than a photograph. It is enhancement of reality - like a Raeburn or a Carravagio, or a Dewing (albeit strange anatomy at times...) or an Ingres.

Sargent enhanced reality and succeeded greatly. So did Bouguereau. Enter creativity and thought and sheer energized concentration of learned technical ability of a true artist - then we use the words "GREAT and INCREDIBLE" to describe the work.

A little late - but I wanted to chime in.

Denise
__________________
DHall
www.denisedhall.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2003, 12:41 AM   #20
Peter Jochems Peter Jochems is offline
Juried Member
'02 Finalist, Artists Mag
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 276
Michele - Thanks!

Peter
__________________
www.peterjochems.nl
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 4 (0 members and 4 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.