 |
06-19-2005, 01:51 PM
|
#1
|
Juried Member FT Professional 10 yrs '05 Artists Mag
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 178
|
While it's probably better not to fool with retouch varnishes and the like, I can understand why one would want to quickly simulate varnish like conditions particularly where clients are concerned.
I discovered in Gamblin's "Notes of Special Interest" you can in fact make a retouch varnish by mixing "1 part Gamvar Varnish with 5 parts Gamsol or other high quality OMS."
The question then arises whether in 6 months time the Gamvar retouch should be removed or left on before varnishing with the full strength product.
Also in his notes Gamblin mentions using cold wax medium as a matting agent. When I see the word "wax" I think of Reynolds and his questionable practices. Perhaps when wax is used in varnish as opposed to medium it's another story.
|
|
|
06-19-2005, 02:24 PM
|
#2
|
SOG Member FT Professional
Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Penngrove, CA
Posts: 122
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Bartner
While it's probably better not to fool with retouch varnishes and the like, I can understand why one would want to quickly simulate varnish like conditions particularly where clients are concerned.
I discovered in Gamblin's "Notes of Special Interest" you can in fact make a retouch varnish by mixing "1 part Gamvar Varnish with 5 parts Gamsol or other high quality OMS."
The question then arises whether in 6 months time the Gamvar retouch should be removed or left on before varnishing with the full strength product.
Also in his notes Gamblin mentions using cold wax medium as a matting agent. When I see the word "wax" I think of Reynolds and his questionable practices. Perhaps when wax is used in varnish as opposed to medium it's another story.
|
Scott,
There would be no reason to remove Gamvar retouch before applying full-strength Gamvar as a final varnish. The solvent in the final varnish would soften the retouch layer and allow it to become part of the final varnish layer. It wouldn't be a good idea to try to remove varnish from an oil paint layer that's less than two years old, anyway. Chances are some paint would come off in the process.
Wax in the varnish, used as a flatting agent, would not be harmful the way it would as an ingredient in the paint.
After an artist has painted his or her heart out on a painting, it seems wrong, to me, to then do something to compromise its longevity out of eagerness to put it out there right away. For people who cannot wait to get rid of their pictures, there is the option of painting in alkyds, acrylic, pastel or watercolor instead.
Virgil Elliott
|
|
|
06-19-2005, 03:04 PM
|
#3
|
Juried Member FT Professional 10 yrs '05 Artists Mag
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Virgil Elliott
After an artist has painted his or her heart out on a painting, it seems wrong, to me, to then do something to compromise its longevity out of eagerness to put it out there right away. For people who cannot wait to get rid of their pictures, there is the option of painting in alkyds, acrylic, pastel or watercolor instead.
Virgil Elliott
|
Agreed Virgil but will using retouch varnish seriously compromise the longevity of a painting? Are Conservators saying this now, because a few years ago it was advocated, at least here in Europe.
Kind of reminds me of the doctors who warned against butter suggesting margarine was a better alternative and then latter olive oil and now no oils. What is the truth? What do you think they will be saying about Gamvar in ten years time? (I won't know because I probably will have died from an olive oil induced coronary.)
|
|
|
06-19-2005, 03:18 PM
|
#4
|
SOG Member FT Professional
Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Penngrove, CA
Posts: 122
|
Scott,
Many questionable practices are or were advocated by one person or another, and it could be very confusing taking them at face value, since they are not all in accord. What one can do to sort things out is to consider the fundamental principles involved. Vegetable oils "dry" by a process that involves the absorption of oxygen, which takes place over a long period of time. It makes sense that to place a barrier of varnish between the paint layer and the air before this process is complete would surely interfere with the proper drying/curing of the paint. To what extent this would manifest itself adversely is an open question, but why risk harm to our own paintings?
Virgil Elliott
|
|
|
06-19-2005, 03:33 PM
|
#5
|
Juried Member FT Professional 10 yrs '05 Artists Mag
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 178
|
This is something to think about. I'm certain I'm not the only artist who retouches before a painting goes out the door. I appreciate the information.
|
|
|
06-19-2005, 08:33 PM
|
#6
|
Juried Member
Joined: May 2005
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 327
|
Thanks to all
This has been a great source of information for me. Unfortunately, I learned to paint with oils before I learned anything about oils.
It was only a year ago that I thought it was O.K. to use Turpenoid Natural as a medium!
|
|
|
06-20-2005, 12:03 AM
|
#7
|
CAFE & BUSINESS MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460
|
When I want to deliver a recently completed commission that has sunken-in dull areas, I "oil out" those parts of the painting with a 50% linseed/50% OMS mixture, rather than using any type of retouch varnish. That evens out the surface quite well and dries to a nice semi gloss finish.
Virgil, does this seem like a sound practice?
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:33 PM.
|