 |
06-11-2005, 12:47 AM
|
#1
|
Juried Member Finalist, Int'l Salon 2006
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 324
|
question of perspective
Hi Dianne,
On top of Sharon and Michele's advice, you may like to look at the issue on perspectives. The way i see this portrait is a slight forward hunch by the model. As a result, certain features of her head and body are subjected to perspective. I hope it makes sense to you.
|
|
|
06-11-2005, 01:00 AM
|
#2
|
Juried Member FT Professional
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 208
|
perspective
Thank you Marcus for the observation on perspective and for your help. You are absolutely right.
However, I took the photograph after I painted the painting. The model was not hunched over but rather sitting quite erect when were were working. I only used the photo for some detail work on her face. It is not a reference photo.
I do appreciate your help.
Dianne
|
|
|
06-12-2005, 06:40 AM
|
#3
|
Juried Member Finalist, Int'l Salon 2006
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 324
|
Oh i'm really sorry...i didn't know that was the case.
|
|
|
06-12-2005, 08:09 AM
|
#4
|
Approved Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,730
|
Dianne,
Studio lighting is a rather complex issue.
I don't know where the skylight is vis-a-vis the model. Check out the book I told you about to help you resolve your lighting isuues.
If it is not a constant light source it is unworkable.
|
|
|
06-12-2005, 07:03 PM
|
#5
|
Juried Member FT Professional
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 208
|
Thank you
Sharon, I am ordering the book as soon as possible. I'm looking forward to reading it.
Marcus, please don't apologize. You didn't know and the information you gave me is valuable.
Best regards
Dianne
|
|
|
06-13-2005, 11:58 PM
|
#6
|
UNVEILINGS MODERATOR Juried Member
Joined: May 2005
Location: Narberth, PA
Posts: 2,485
|
Dianne,
I really like this painting. It's true that simpler lighting would make the three-dimentional effect more convincing and easier to achieve. But I find the pattern of light and shadow on the model's face interesting.
There are two main issues that stand out for me.
1) The left side of the model's mouth (right side of painting) seems stretched out, and so does her entire jaw on that side. Of course this is just compared to the way she looks in the photo.
2) The background is distracting, especially the light, jagged shape in the top right. It actually breaks up into pieces that do not all read as being background. I would suggest you try for a more unified background, especially since her face is full of pattern.
I think you have done an excellent job under challenging lighting conditions.
Alex
|
|
|
06-14-2005, 12:39 AM
|
#7
|
Juried Member FT Professional
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 208
|
Thank you Alex
I will be painting on this again tomorrow and will take a closer look at the mouth. She has a little bit of a crooked smile that is very much her peronsality and I am attempting to capture it. But I certainly don't want it to make her face look distorted.
Sharon and Michele, I visited your websites and am truly impressed with your work. I have one question to ask you that has been gnawing on my mind for a long time. In all the contemporary portraits that I see today there is this deep beautiful dark in the background. What is that color? It couldn't possibly be black and I'm sure it is more than burnt umber. Do you mix a blue in with it and if so what kind?
I've yet to be able to mimic it.
Also, do you start with a monochrome painting and then glaze? I suppose there are other forums that deal with those questions and I will investigate them and hope I can find the answers.
Thank you for taking the time to help me.
Dianne
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:47 AM.
|