 |
01-02-2003, 10:33 PM
|
#1
|
Associate Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Big Spring, TX
Posts: 32
|
Silly Sisters
I'm almost finished with this graphite portrait of my daughters. I took a few pictures of it with my digital camera, but none of them turned out very great.
When I use my flash it creates a "glare" on the darker graphite. If I don't use a flash it is orange (I have terrible lighting in my house). I tried to shine a light on it, but that doesn't seem to work well, either. I would go outside, but it is always dark when I get home - hate winter sun.
I'm posting two of the better pictures of this portrait. I just need a few opinions on the darks and I'd like to add something in the background, although it may be too much.
This is graphite on paper, 13"x15".
HELP!
Thanks,
Dianna
|
|
|
01-02-2003, 10:35 PM
|
#2
|
Associate Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Big Spring, TX
Posts: 32
|
Here is the 2nd picture - it turned out a little orange.
|
|
|
01-02-2003, 11:06 PM
|
#3
|
Juried Member Guy who can draw a little
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: New Iberia, LA
Posts: 546
|
I think it was Karin who posted a how-to article on photographing your work outdoors. Of course, you have to get home before dark.
I have a cheap digital camera, but I get pretty good results using her suggestions. The stuff I've posted here was done with a scanner. That's the best thing if your image fits.
|
|
|
01-03-2003, 10:49 PM
|
#4
|
SENIOR MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional, Author '03 Finalist, PSofATL '02 Finalist, PSofATL '02 1st Place, WCSPA '01 Honors, WCSPA Featured in Artists Mag.
Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,481
|
Dear Dianna,
I have just a couple of comments to offer. It looks as if you took the resource photograph with a flash attachment. If you haven't already had a chance to read the many helpful comments on lighting subjects, you can go to the "Lighting and Photographing your Subject" section for some great reading http://forum.portraitartist.com/foru...s=&forumid=47. Without good source material, your outcome will always be severely compromised. Even with the best of resource photos, the shadows will appear falsely dark, especially in the nasal labial folds connecting the corners of the mouth with the nose. Only you can compensate for this in your portrait.
Despite the limits of your source material, you have a good command of very subtle modeling of value, which you should be able to readily translate into your next drawing or painting. Your darks look sufficiently dark to me. I also don't feel that with the crop and composition of this portrait, that you need a background. There's a lot going on here, and your negative spaces are working well.
With regard to design/compositional issues, watch for tangents in your painting, as they can easily overpower your center of attention and control the viewer's eye in unintended ways.(See diagram below.) There are three major tangents here that I see: first, the place where the foreward child's hair exactly touches the curve of the older child's jaw; second, the sharpness of the plaid in the shirt, which touches the foreward child's upper lip, as well as entering her mouth at the top of the lower lip. Third, the shape of the neckline is also more repetitive than you would want, a continuation of the shape of the smaller girl's profiled nose. Fortunately, tangents are usually pretty easy to fix.
Last (although it should probably be first) there is the central point to the painting, which is the center of interest. There are lots of things that shape this for the viewer, but among the most powerful are tools like high contrast, and sharp edges (other tools that would apply to color include saturation, and discordant color). On my monitior, the center of interest is older girl's teeth. Because they are rendered with individual shapes, high contrast, sharp edges, and highlights on the gums, they are the most prominent part of the portrait to me. I find that it helps me, when working from photos, to keep reminding myself of the focus of my piece, because photos are misleading in the detail they want to show to you.
Best wishes,
|
|
|
01-04-2003, 02:10 PM
|
#5
|
Associate Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Big Spring, TX
Posts: 32
|
Dear Chris,
Thank you so much for your time! I will try to make a few minor adjustments, as you suggested, to this portrait. I will first try to take a better photo of this work. It looks a lot better in life, of course. The original photo of the girls was taken with a flash, a spur of the moment picture. It is very difficult to photograph these two, as they are always on the go. Also, my house has terrible lighting and few windows. I'll try some outside photos next time.
Thanks again,
Dianna
|
|
|
01-22-2003, 04:37 AM
|
#6
|
Juried Member FT Professional
Joined: Feb 2002
Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland
Posts: 698
|
The figures are stiff, as though they are mannequins. You maybe need to have a drink or something while you work.
Seriously, the front light causes the highlights to be in the center, forcing the modeling of dark edges. Not pretty for graphite.
|
|
|
01-22-2003, 10:13 AM
|
#7
|
Associate Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Big Spring, TX
Posts: 32
|
Lon,
I have since learned about lighting and positioning the subjects. This was done from a photo I had taken with a flash in dim light. My resourse photos will be better from now on.
Yes, I am very "stiff" myself. I have a real hard time "loosening up". My pastel portraits are a little looser, but I am working on it. My work will be better in the future.
Thank you for your time!
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Topic Tools |
Search this Topic |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:14 PM.
|