Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sharon Knettell
What do you think? Any comments?
|
I think that it's odious because it is made to fool people to make them believe that they are buying real paintings which they are not.
I would not trust any company that so obviously fiddle with the evidence.
I have never seen a copy of anything that would reflect the light exactly the same way as the original ! Look at the four examples of the girl in front of the field of red flowers and check out any point. It's the same photo used for the reference and "painting" -- it's phony !
They think they are smart, but I don't think so.
I don't know how they do, but I could come up with a lot of suggestions. These days you can print anything on a surface, with an Ink Laser printer, even upon a "brushstrokes" textured canvas and ad some luscious, genuine, handmade small brushstrokes ( that would not disturb anything
)
Sorry, almost forgot, a handwritten signature.
