|
Hi again Lisa.
I see the resemblance in those eyes... and being able to compare with the reference still think that the eye on our left is 'stretched'. It also appears to be angled slightly flatter than in the reference. I'm attaching a direct (scaled to the width of the eyebrows) vertical comparison with overlying guidelines... both eyes actually seem slightly on the wide side relative to the eyebrows... but it is that the eye on our right doesn't seem to curve away from us on the outside corner that troubles me. If you look at the guideline that spans across both her eyes from outside corner to outside corner... you'll notice a deep shadow at the left most hash mark on the reference where the white of the eye appears to continue on the painting... the brow bone between the brow and top eyelid (both eyes?) is also more in shadow (both eyes?)... Don't know if pushing that down a tiny bit would help?
On the hands... you're right, that's an unfortunate, kind of problematic reference. Sometimes you've got to take things as far as you can with the reference, then step away from the reference and look only at the painting and address how it reads. I agree with Mike that reducing the values of the lights on those hands seems called for.... reducing the contrast this way (both hands) might help to reduce that appearance of flatness/boxiness. Perhaps unifying the shadows under the far wrist might help things on that side. In any case, reducing the brightness of those hands will allow our eyes to be directed more towards her face. . .
|