Thread: Color truth
View Single Post
Old 02-08-2003, 10:56 PM   #4
Marvin Mattelson Marvin Mattelson is offline
SOG Member
FT Professional
'04 Merit Award PSA
'04 Best Portfolio PSA
'03 Honors Artists Magazine
'01 Second Prize ASOPA
Perm. Collection- Ntl. Portrait Gallery
Perm. Collection- Met
Leads Workshops
 
Marvin Mattelson's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Location: Great Neck, NY
Posts: 1,093
Mix master

Going for the color directly is impractical, in my opinion, simply because it is impossible to duplicate nature in paint. You can't recreate the red of a rose in sunlight in paint. If the hue is correct then the value will be dark. If the value is correct then the hue will be bleached out.

What you perceive in reality is the result of additive color (light) mixtures while the colors you mix are the result of subtractive color (pigment) mixtures.

The key is to understand the relationships you see before you, and while maintaining them, ratio the colors and values down so that the relationships are recreated within the realm of pigment.

Ultimately you must choose between value and color. If you favor form then value comes first.

As a teacher, I have had great results teaching color mixing by having my students separate the three aspects of color: hue, value and chroma.

The greatest painters were also great scientists (objective observers who constanly strove to understand why the world appeared to them the way it did) and clever thinkers who never attempted to copy nature, but strove to enhance it instead. The choices they made, based on their analysis of nature, is what defines their creations as works of pure genius.
__________________
Marvin Mattelson
http://www.fineartportrait.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote