![]() |
Removing varnish
What would be the process, and the risks, of removing Damar varnish from a finished painting?
|
Not much risk if you adhered to the drying principles of your painting before you varnished! It is a painstaking, tedious and miserable job, but it can be done. I wouldn't have worried about it until a 3" gash was ripped into the linen of a painting, similar to a replay from the movie "The War of the Roses" in my second marriage!
Otherwise, if I was so lucky, I would wait until I am dead for some conservator two centuries from now in some museum to see the genius in my work to want to go to the trouble. Mike, why the concern? L |
Let me ask the question a little differently. What if you needed [wanted] to make modifications to a painting that had already been varnished. Wouldn't you have to remove the varnish?
|
Mike,
The proper method is to remove the entire varnish from the painting. Removing a small area to paint back into will work, but the trick is varnishing that area so it will feather back into the old varnish; it never looks right. Varnishing properly with Damar is a lot tricker than one would think. I have messed up paintings that looked like a glazed donut afterwards! You work a small area at a time, dipping your cotton swab into turpentine, soaking that small surface area, rubbing very gently, squeazing the cotton dry, resoaking and repeat until the swab is too saturated with Damar, where you will then pick up another clean swab, and continue the process over the whole surface area. Slow work, bad fumes, but it can be done. L |
Quote:
Thanks for the help, Leo. |
1 Attachment(s)
Miguel,
You can either buy ready-made Damar varnish or make your own, which is considerable cheaper! I prefer to buy the Damar crystals, which are inexpensive at any art store. They dilute readily with turpentine almost overnight, and much faster if you crush the crystals. By weight, dilute equally. Now you have a varnish that is thick, but has impurities in it: let sit for a couple of weeks or longer, so the nasty stuff settles to the bottom. Decant the clear varnish off and discard the gunk! Now you have something to work with. This needs to be diluted further with turpentine. I personally do not like the beautiful shiny surface that Damar creates because of the glare that it produces to the viewer. I add beeswax, pastilles unbleached, which again can be procured at any art store. It produces a wonderful matte finish that unifies the sunken areas in your painting as well as reduces the glare to the viewer. For this recipe, I take the original varnish of 4 parts Damar, 1 part wax and 2 parts turpentine, which needs to be heated over a low heat to combine all of the ingredients, especially essential in wax. Best to do outside, if one has any apprehensions about fumes or combustibility. Store in jars until ready to use. Now you are ready to varnish in whatever drying time frame of your painting you adhere too. Lay painting flat in a dust free area. Again, heat the wax/Damar varnish over a low heat. Important to apply heated! Get yourself a very good varnish brush. Escoda makes a wonderful ox hair brush, but whatever your choice, make sure it is top quality! Nothing is more frustrating than a poor, uneven application of varnish, and even worst yet, hairs being deposited on your work! Again a heated Damar/wax is essential! Load sparingly and work fast over small areas before progressing to the next area. Have good lighting and angle your view so you can easily see the glare in the areas you have missed so that you can attain to them quickly before moving on. If you have to go back to semi- or dried areas of varnish you are usually in trouble. This is where a painting that is varnished improperly will overlap itself over semi-dry/dry areas. You don |
Muchas gracias, Leo.
You go to all that trouble and then your future ex-wife puts her fist through it. It just doesn't seem right. |
M,
No blame, it always takes two to tango and I must have been stepping on her toes while she was looking for a better tango! L |
Why bother,
Why use a varnish that is so problematic to remove, jeopardizing the underlying paint layers, not to mention exposure to a highly toxic thinner turpentine. Damar varnish is about as relevant as outdoor plumbing these days.
Gamblin makes a varnish called Gamvar (gaining high praise from conservators world wide) which can be more easily removed using much less toxic Gamsol (mineral spirits.) The great traditions of Western Art are certainly worthy of being sustained. The use of Damar varnish isn't one of them! |
Well Marvy!
Did you even read the initial post by Mike, before jumping in with your Gamblin propaganda. I haven't posted much on this forum, but have paid visits almost daily and one thing I have observed is your constant reminder to folks here how Gamblin products are going to save the day, like the TV Superman in the 50's! Others, as well as myself, have come to the conclusion, you either work for them or have a dreadful fear of your art materials. Gamsol, Damvar, etc., what kind of advetising gimmick names are these? I am sure they are more of these names on the horizon all starting with Gam, or something or another that you can even use as lotion after using toxic oil paint! Sounds like they are copying by using derivatives from the names of the real stuff! Believe me, they are just as toxic if you are foolish enough to substitute them for the topping on your cesear salad. Gary Hoff, a physician said it all to well in another section of the other Forum. Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.